Literature DB >> 30406422

The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system™ and the Fick method in cardiac surgery patients.

Takuma Maeda1,2, Eisuke Hamaguchi3, Naoko Kubo3, Akira Shimokawa3, Hiroko Kanazawa3, Yoshihiko Ohnishi3.   

Abstract

To compare the accuracy and trending ability of the cardiac index (CI) measured by FloTrac/Vigileo™ (CIFT) or derived by the Fick equation (CIFick) using E-CAiOVX (enables continuous monitoring of oxygen consumption) with that measured by thermodilution (CITD) in patients with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Twenty-two patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were included. CIFT and CIFick were determined simultaneously at six time-points during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. At each time-point, phenylephrine (50 µg) was administered to increase systematic vascular resistance, with CI measured before and after administration (CITD used as reference method). Agreement of each method was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis, while trending ability was evaluated by four-quadrant plot analysis and polar plot analysis. By Bland-Altman analysis, CIFT and CIFick showed percentage errors of 49.5% and 78.6%, respectively, compared with CITD. Subgroup analysis showed a percentage error between COFT and COTD of 28.9% in patients with a CI ≥ 2.4 L/min/m2, and 78.1% in patients with a CI ≥ 2.4 L/min/m2. The concordance rate of four-quadrant plot analysis was 93.3% for CIFT and 66.7% for CIFick in datasets where CITD ≥ 2.4 L/min/m2 before and after phenylephrine administration were included. CIFT and CIFick had wide limits of agreement with CITD, and were below acceptable limits for tracking phenylephrine-induced CI changes. However, subgroup analysis showed improved accuracy and trending ability of CIFT when only points where CITD ≥ 2.4 L/min/m2 were included, while there was no improvement in CIFick accuracy or trending ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure monitor; Cardiac output; Fick principle; Thermodilution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30406422     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0217-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  26 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare?

Authors:  Jacob Pugsley; Adam B Lerner
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-11-07

4.  Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Xiao X Yang; Anna Lee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery.

Authors:  Gianni Biancofiore; Lester A H Critchley; Anna Lee; Xiao-xing Yang; Lucia M Bindi; Massimo Esposito; Massimo Bisà; Luca Meacci; Roberto Mozzo; Franco Filipponi
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Measured pulmonary oxygen consumption: difference between systemic oxygen uptake measured by the reverse Fick method and indirect calorimetry in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  P J Peyton; G J B Robinson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Comparison of oxygen consumption measurements: indirect calorimetry versus the reversed Fick method.

Authors:  M N Smithies; B Royston; K Makita; K Konieczko; J F Nunn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.

Authors:  Y Kanda
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery -- a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Michael Gillies; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurie Doolan; Brian Buxton
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  An observational feasibility study - does early limb ergometry affect oxygen delivery and uptake in intubated critically ill patients - a comparison of two assessment methods.

Authors:  Olive M Wilkinson; Andrew Bates; Rebecca Cusack
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dominic P Recco; Nathalie Roy; Alexander J Gregory; Kevin W Lobdell
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 4.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Efficacy of minimal invasive cardiac output and ScVO2 monitoring during controlled hypotension for double-jaw surgery.

Authors:  Seokkon Kim; Jaegyok Song; Sungmi Ji; Min A Kwon; Dajeong Nam
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-27

6.  Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Ulf Lorenzen; Markus Pohlmann; Jonathan Hansen; Phil Klose; Matthias Gruenewald; Jochen Renner; Gunnar Elke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.