| Literature DB >> 29142878 |
Taha Özyürek1, Koray Yılmaz2, Gülşah Uslu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: It was aimed to compare the cyclic fatigue resistances of ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Next (PTN), and ProTaper Gold (PTG) and the effects of sterilization by autoclave on the cyclic fatigue life of nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments.Entities:
Keywords: Endodontics; Gold-wire; M-wire; Nickel-titanium; Sterilization
Year: 2017 PMID: 29142878 PMCID: PMC5682146 DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.4.301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Restor Dent Endod ISSN: 2234-7658
Figure 1The artificial canal that used in the present study (the radii and the angle of the curvature).
Baseline scores of number of cycles to failure (NCF) for all nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments (no sterilization)
| Sterilization condition | ProTaper Gold | ProTaper Next | ProTaper Universal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCF | G3 | G4 | NCF | G3 | G4 | NCF | G3 | G4 | ||
| No sterilization | 1,045.21 ± 198.24 | 525.44 ± 94.67 | 248.12 ± 32.52 | |||||||
| After cycling to | ||||||||||
| 25% of NCF | 262 | 20 | 20 | 132 | 20 | 20 | 62 | 20 | 20 | |
| 50% of NCF | 523 | 20 | 19 | 263 | 18 | 17 | 124 | 15 | 14 | |
| 75% of NCF | 784 | 19 | 18 | 394 | 16 | 16 | 186 | 13 | 12 | |
Values are presented as number of instruments. The number of instruments that survived after being cycled to the cycles of 25%, 50%, and 75% of the mean baseline NCF values (ProTaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; ProTaper Next, Dentsply Maillefer; ProTaper Universal, Dentsply Maillefer).
G3, group 3 (instruments tested were sterilized after being exposed to 25%, 50%, and 75% of the NCF); G4, group 4 (instruments exposed at 25%, 50%, and 75% of the NCF without any sterilization).
The number of cycles to failure (NCF) for instruments that were not sterilized as received from the package (group 1), instruments sterilized 10 times before any use (group 2), instruments tested were sterilized after being exposed to 25%, 50%, and 75% of the NCF (group 3), and instruments exposed at 25%, 50%, and 75% of the NCF without any sterilization (group 4)
| Group | ProTaper Gold | ProTaper Next | ProTaper Universal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As received without sterilization (group 1) | 1,045.21 ± 198.24Aa | 525.44 ± 94.67Ba | 248.12 ± 32.52Ca | < 0.05 |
| Sterilization 10 times before cyclic stress (group 2) | 1,306.34 ± 248.22Ab | 624.26 ± 112.72Bb | 252.09 ± 33.59Ca | < 0.05 |
| Sterilized after each cyclic stress (group 3) | 1,107.55 ± 210.04Aa | 713.32 ± 128.92Bb | 223.52 ± 28.43Ca | < 0.05 |
| No sterilization, but tested after cyclic stresses (group 4) | 1,003.67 ± 190.26Aa | 504.67 ± 90.23Ba | 231.87 ± 30.62Ca | < 0.05 |
| < 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | - |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (ProTaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; ProTaper Next, Dentsply Maillefer; ProTaper Universal, Dentsply Maillefer).
Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (A,B,Cfor rows, a,bfor columns) (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopic appearances of the ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Next (PTN), and ProTaper Gold (PTG) files after cyclic fatigue testing. View of the fractured surface (A) PTU, (C) PTN, and (E) PTG and high-magnification view of (B) PTU, (D) PTN, and (F) PTG instruments showing fatigue striations typical of cyclic fatigue (arrows).
ProTaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; ProTaper Next, Dentsply Maillefer; ProTaper Universal, Dentsply Maillefer.