Literature DB >> 28017738

Validation of the radiobiology toolkit TOPAS-nBio in simple DNA geometries.

Aimee McNamara1, Changran Geng2, Robert Turner3, Jose Ramos Mendez4, Joseph Perl5, Kathryn Held2, Bruce Faddegon4, Harald Paganetti2, Jan Schuemann2.   

Abstract

Computational simulations offer a powerful tool for quantitatively investigating radiation interactions with biological tissue and can help bridge the gap between physics, chemistry and biology. The TOPAS collaboration is tackling this challenge by extending the current Monte Carlo tool to allow for sub-cellular in silico simulations in a new extension, TOPAS-nBio. TOPAS wraps and extends the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit and the new extension allows the modeling of particles down to vibrational energies (∼2eV) within realistic biological geometries. Here we present a validation of biological geometries available in TOPAS-nBio, by comparing our results to two previously published studies. We compare the prediction of strand breaks in a simple linear DNA strand from TOPAS-nBio to a published Monte Carlo track structure simulation study. While TOPAS-nBio confirms the trend in strand break generation, it predicts a higher frequency of events below an energy of 17.5eV compared to the alternative Monte Carlo track structure study. This is due to differences in the physics models used by each code. We also compare the experimental measurement of strand breaks from incident protons in DNA plasmids to TOPAS-nBio simulations. Our results show good agreement of single and double strand breaks predicting a similar increase in the strand break yield with increasing LET.
Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA strand break; Monte Carlo simulation; Track structure; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017738      PMCID: PMC5292291          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  24 in total

Review 1.  Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.

Authors:  M A Bernal; M C Bordage; J M C Brown; M Davídková; E Delage; Z El Bitar; S A Enger; Z Francis; S Guatelli; V N Ivanchenko; M Karamitros; I Kyriakou; L Maigne; S Meylan; K Murakami; S Okada; H Payno; Y Perrot; I Petrovic; Q T Pham; A Ristic-Fira; T Sasaki; V Štěpán; H N Tran; C Villagrasa; S Incerti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 2.  Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Michael Dingfelder; Pavel Kundrát; Peter Jacob
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Calculation of initial yields of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles.

Authors:  D E Charlton; H Nikjoo; J L Humm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Predicted ionisation in mitochondria and observed acute changes in the mitochondrial transcriptome after gamma irradiation: a Monte Carlo simulation and quantitative PCR study.

Authors:  Winnie Wai-Ying Kam; Aimee L McNamara; Vanessa Lake; Connie Banos; Justin B Davies; Zdenka Kuncic; Richard B Banati
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.160

Review 6.  Review of Geant4-DNA applications for micro and nanoscale simulations.

Authors:  S Incerti; M Douglass; S Penfold; S Guatelli; E Bezak
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 7.  Radiation mutagenesis: the initial DNA lesions responsible.

Authors:  J F Ward
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA.

Authors:  D T Goodhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Range of radiochemical damage to DNA with decay of iodine-125.

Authors:  R F Martin; W A Haseltine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mitochondria regulate DNA damage and genomic instability induced by high LET radiation.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Mercy M Davidson; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  Dependence of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization on cell geometry.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Sung-Joon Ye; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; James Hainfeld; Jungwook Shin; Henry M Smilowitz; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Flagged uniform particle splitting for variance reduction in proton and carbon ion track-structure simulations.

Authors:  José Ramos-Méndez; Jan Schuemann; Sebastien Incerti; Harald Paganetti; Reinhard Schulte; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes.

Authors:  W B Li; A Belchior; M Beuve; Y Z Chen; S Di Maria; W Friedland; B Gervais; B Heide; N Hocine; A Ipatov; A P Klapproth; C Y Li; J L Li; G Multhoff; F Poignant; R Qiu; H Rabus; B Rudek; J Schuemann; S Stangl; E Testa; C Villagrasa; W Z Xie; Y B Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Energy optimization in gold nanoparticle enhanced radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Computational Modeling and Clonogenic Assay for Radioenhancement of Gold Nanoparticles Using 3D Live Cell Images.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Yoon Jeong; Hyejin Kim; Hoibin Jeong; Clemens Grassberger; Seongmoon Jung; G-One Ahn; Il Han Kim; Jan Schuemann; Kangwon Lee; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  TOPAS-nBio: An Extension to the TOPAS Simulation Toolkit for Cellular and Sub-cellular Radiobiology.

Authors:  J Schuemann; A L McNamara; J Ramos-Méndez; J Perl; K D Held; H Paganetti; S Incerti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Geometrical structures for radiation biology research as implemented in the TOPAS-nBio toolkit.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; José Ramos-Méndez; Joseph Perl; Kathryn Held; Naoki Dominguez; Eduardo Moreno; Nicholas T Henthorn; Karen J Kirkby; Sylvain Meylan; Carmen Villagrasa; Sebastien Incerti; Bruce Faddegon; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Monte Carlo simulation of chemistry following radiolysis with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; J Perl; J Schuemann; A McNamara; H Paganetti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  DNA double-strand breaks as a method of radiation measurements for therapeutic beams.

Authors:  Mohammad Obeidat; Kristen A McConnell; Xiaolei Li; Brian Bui; Sotirios Stathakis; Niko Papanikolaou; Karl Rasmussen; Chul Soo Ha; Sang Eun Lee; Eun Yong Shim; Neil Kirby
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.