Literature DB >> 28594336

Flagged uniform particle splitting for variance reduction in proton and carbon ion track-structure simulations.

José Ramos-Méndez1, Jan Schuemann, Sebastien Incerti, Harald Paganetti, Reinhard Schulte, Bruce Faddegon.   

Abstract

Flagged uniform particle splitting was implemented with two methods to improve the computational efficiency of Monte Carlo track structure simulations with TOPAS-nBio by enhancing the production of secondary electrons in ionization events. In method 1 the Geant4 kernel was modified. In method 2 Geant4 was not modified. In both methods a unique flag number assigned to each new split electron was inherited by its progeny, permitting reclassification of the split events as if produced by independent histories. Computational efficiency and accuracy were evaluated for simulations of 0.5-20 MeV protons and 1-20 MeV u-1 carbon ions for three endpoints: (1) mean of the ionization cluster size distribution, (2) mean number of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs) classified with DBSCAN, and (3) mean number of SSBs and DSBs classified with a geometry-based algorithm. For endpoint (1), simulation efficiency was 3 times lower when splitting electrons generated by direct ionization events of primary particles than when splitting electrons generated by the first ionization events of secondary electrons. The latter technique was selected for further investigation. The following results are for method 2, with relative efficiencies about 4.5 times lower for method 1. For endpoint (1), relative efficiency at 128 split electrons approached maximum, increasing with energy from 47.2  ±  0.2 to 66.9  ±  0.2 for protons, decreasing with energy from 51.3  ±  0.4 to 41.7  ±  0.2 for carbon. For endpoint (2), relative efficiency increased with energy, from 20.7  ±  0.1 to 50.2  ±  0.3 for protons, 15.6  ±  0.1 to 20.2  ±  0.1 for carbon. For endpoint (3) relative efficiency increased with energy, from 31.0  ±  0.2 to 58.2  ±  0.4 for protons, 23.9  ±  0.1 to 26.2  ±  0.2 for carbon. Simulation results with and without splitting agreed within 1% (2 standard deviations) for endpoints (1) and (2), within 2% (1 standard deviation) for endpoint (3). In conclusion, standard particle splitting variance reduction techniques can be successfully implemented in Monte Carlo track structure codes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594336      PMCID: PMC5785278          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulation of energy-deposit clustering for ions of the same LET in liquid water.

Authors:  Z Francis; S Incerti; V Ivanchenko; C Champion; M Karamitros; M A Bernal; Z El Bitar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low-energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiations.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; D T Goodhead
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Physical models implemented in the GEANT4-DNA extension of the GEANT-4 toolkit for calculating initial radiation damage at the molecular level.

Authors:  C Villagrasa; Z Francis; S Incerti
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.

Authors:  M A Bernal; M C Bordage; J M C Brown; M Davídková; E Delage; Z El Bitar; S A Enger; Z Francis; S Guatelli; V N Ivanchenko; M Karamitros; I Kyriakou; L Maigne; S Meylan; K Murakami; S Okada; H Payno; Y Perrot; I Petrovic; Q T Pham; A Ristic-Fira; T Sasaki; V Štěpán; H N Tran; C Villagrasa; S Incerti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; P O'Neill; D T Goodhead; M Terrissol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Future development of biologically relevant dosimetry.

Authors:  H Palmans; H Rabus; A L Belchior; M U Bug; S Galer; U Giesen; G Gonon; G Gruel; G Hilgers; D Moro; H Nettelbeck; M Pinto; A Pola; S Pszona; G Schettino; P H G Sharpe; P Teles; C Villagrasa; J J Wilkens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA.

Authors:  D T Goodhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Validation of the radiobiology toolkit TOPAS-nBio in simple DNA geometries.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Changran Geng; Robert Turner; Jose Ramos Mendez; Joseph Perl; Kathryn Held; Bruce Faddegon; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Formation of ionization clusters in nanometric structures of propane-based tissue-equivalent gas or liquid water by electrons and alpha-particles.

Authors:  B Grosswendt
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  TOPAS-nBio: An Extension to the TOPAS Simulation Toolkit for Cellular and Sub-cellular Radiobiology.

Authors:  J Schuemann; A L McNamara; J Ramos-Méndez; J Perl; K D Held; H Paganetti; S Incerti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Geometrical structures for radiation biology research as implemented in the TOPAS-nBio toolkit.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; José Ramos-Méndez; Joseph Perl; Kathryn Held; Naoki Dominguez; Eduardo Moreno; Nicholas T Henthorn; Karen J Kirkby; Sylvain Meylan; Carmen Villagrasa; Sebastien Incerti; Bruce Faddegon; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Monte Carlo simulation of chemistry following radiolysis with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; J Perl; J Schuemann; A McNamara; H Paganetti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Review of the Geant4-DNA Simulation Toolkit for Radiobiological Applications at the Cellular and DNA Level.

Authors:  Ioanna Kyriakou; Dousatsu Sakata; Hoang Ngoc Tran; Yann Perrot; Wook-Geun Shin; Nathanael Lampe; Sara Zein; Marie Claude Bordage; Susanna Guatelli; Carmen Villagrasa; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Sébastien Incerti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy.

Authors:  José Ramos-Méndez; Lucas N Burigo; Reinhard Schulte; Cynthia Chuang; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  LET-Dependent Intertrack Yields in Proton Irradiation at Ultra-High Dose Rates Relevant for FLASH Therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; N Domínguez-Kondo; J Schuemann; A McNamara; E Moreno-Barbosa; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.841

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.