Literature DB >> 31918367

Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes.

W B Li1, A Belchior2, M Beuve3, Y Z Chen4, S Di Maria2, W Friedland5, B Gervais6, B Heide7, N Hocine8, A Ipatov9, A P Klapproth10, C Y Li11, J L Li4, G Multhoff12, F Poignant3, R Qiu4, H Rabus13, B Rudek14, J Schuemann15, S Stangl12, E Testa3, C Villagrasa8, W Z Xie4, Y B Zhang16.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Targeted radiation therapy has seen an increased interest in the past decade. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed enhanced radiation doses due to gold nanoparticles (GNPs) to tumors in mice and demonstrated a high potential for clinical application. However, finding a functionalized molecular formulation for actively targeting GNPs in tumor cells is challenging. Furthermore, the enhanced energy deposition by secondary electrons around GNPs, particularly by short-ranged Auger electrons is difficult to measure. Computational models, such as Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes, have been used to estimate the physical quantities and effects of GNPs. However, as these codes differ from one to another, the reliability of physical and dosimetric quantities needs to be established at cellular and molecular levels, so that the subsequent biological effects can be assessed quantitatively.
METHODS: In this work, irradiation of single GNPs of 50 nm and 100 nm diameter by X-ray spectra generated by 50 and 100 peak kilovoltages was simulated for a defined geometry setup, by applying multiple MC codes in the EURADOS framework.
RESULTS: The mean dose enhancement ratio of the first 10 nm-thick water shell around a 100 nm GNP ranges from 400 for 100 kVp X-rays to 600 for 50 kVp X-rays with large uncertainty factors up to 2.3.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the absolute dose enhancement effects have large uncertainties and need an inter-code intercomparison for a high quality assurance; relative properties may be a better measure until more experimental data is available to constrain the models.
Copyright © 2019 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose enhancement; Gold nanoparticles; Targeted radiotherapy; X-rays

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31918367      PMCID: PMC7446940          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  64 in total

1.  Resonant formation of DNA strand breaks by low-energy (3 to 20 eV) electrons.

Authors:  B Boudaïffa; P Cloutier; D Hunting; M A Huels; L Sanche
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Calculation of DNA strand breakage by neutralisation effect after 125I decays in a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide using charge transfer theory.

Authors:  W B Li
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Design and characterization of HER-2-targeted gold nanoparticles for enhanced X-radiation treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Niladri Chattopadhyay; Zhongli Cai; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Brian Keller; Eli Lechtman; Reina Bendayan; Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Nanoscale energy deposition by X-ray absorbing nanostructures.

Authors:  Joshua D Carter; Neal N Cheng; Yongquan Qu; George D Suarez; Ting Guo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Michael Dingfelder; Pavel Kundrát; Peter Jacob
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  The role of recent nanotechnology in enhancing the efficacy of radiation therapy.

Authors:  Judith W J Bergs; Matthias G Wacker; Stephanie Hehlgans; Albrecht Piiper; Gabriele Multhoff; Claus Rödel; Franz Rödel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Validation of the radiobiology toolkit TOPAS-nBio in simple DNA geometries.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Changran Geng; Robert Turner; Jose Ramos Mendez; Joseph Perl; Kathryn Held; Bruce Faddegon; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Computational Modeling and Clonogenic Assay for Radioenhancement of Gold Nanoparticles Using 3D Live Cell Images.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Yoon Jeong; Hyejin Kim; Hoibin Jeong; Clemens Grassberger; Seongmoon Jung; G-One Ahn; Il Han Kim; Jan Schuemann; Kangwon Lee; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Cellular uptake and transport of gold nanoparticles incorporated in a liposomal carrier.

Authors:  Devika B Chithrani; Michael Dunne; James Stewart; Christine Allen; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Imaging of Hsp70-positive tumors with cmHsp70.1 antibody-conjugated gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mathias K Gehrmann; Melanie A Kimm; Stefan Stangl; Thomas E Schmid; Peter B Noël; Ernst J Rummeny; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-09-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Consistency checks of results from a Monte Carlo code intercomparison for emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle irradiated by X-rays.

Authors:  H Rabus; W B Li; H Nettelbeck; J Schuemann; C Villagrasa; M Beuve; S Di Maria; B Heide; A P Klapproth; F Poignant; R Qiu; B Rudek
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.743

2.  Catalytic activity imperative for nanoparticle dose enhancement in photon and proton therapy.

Authors:  Lukas R H Gerken; Alexander Gogos; Fabian H L Starsich; Helena David; Maren E Gerdes; Hans Schiefer; Serena Psoroulas; David Meer; Ludwig Plasswilm; Damien C Weber; Inge K Herrmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Intercomparison of Monte Carlo calculated dose enhancement ratios for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays: Assessing the uncertainty and correct methodology for extended beams.

Authors:  H Rabus; W B Li; C Villagrasa; J Schuemann; P A Hepperle; L de la Fuente Rosales; M Beuve; S Di Maria; A P Klapproth; C Y Li; F Poignant; B Rudek; H Nettelbeck
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Breast radiotherapy with kilovoltage photons and gold nanoparticles as radiosensitizer: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Alessia Tudda; Elisabetta Donzelli; Gabriella Nicolini; Sara Semperboni; Mario Bossi; Guido Cavaletti; Roberta Castriconi; Paola Mangili; Antonella Del Vecchio; Antonio Sarno; Giovanni Mettivier; Paolo Russo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Monte Carlo simulation of physical dose enhancement in core-shell magnetic gold nanoparticles with TOPAS.

Authors:  Xiaohan Xu; Jianan Wu; Zhitao Dai; Rui Hu; Yaoqin Xie; Luhua Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: Quantifying the Radiobiological Damage Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Chatzipapas; Panagiotis Papadimitroulas; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Spyridon A Kalospyros; Megumi Hada; Alexandros G Georgakilas; George C Kagadis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Radiolabeled Gold Nanoseeds Decorated with Substance P Peptides: Synthesis, Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation in Glioblastoma Cellular Models.

Authors:  Francisco Silva; Alice D'Onofrio; Carolina Mendes; Catarina Pinto; Ana Marques; Maria Paula Cabral Campello; Maria Cristina Oliveira; Paula Raposinho; Ana Belchior; Salvatore Di Maria; Fernanda Marques; Carla Cruz; Josué Carvalho; António Paulo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.