Literature DB >> 29745994

DNA double-strand breaks as a method of radiation measurements for therapeutic beams.

Mohammad Obeidat1, Kristen A McConnell1, Xiaolei Li1, Brian Bui1, Sotirios Stathakis1, Niko Papanikolaou1, Karl Rasmussen1, Chul Soo Ha1, Sang Eun Lee1, Eun Yong Shim1, Neil Kirby1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many types of dosimeters are used to measure radiation dose and calibrate radiotherapy equipment, but none directly measure the biological effect of this dose. The purpose here is to create a dosimeter that can measure the probability of double-strand breaks (DSB) for DNA, which is directly related to the biological effect of radiation.
METHODS: A DNA dosimeter, consisting of magnetic streptavidin beads attached to four kilobase pair DNA strands labeled with biotin and fluorescein amidite (FAM) on opposing ends, was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Fifty microliter samples were placed in plastic tubes inside a water tank setup and irradiated at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy. After irradiation, the dosimeters were mechanically separated into beads (intact DNA) and supernatant (broken DNA/FAM) using a magnet. The fluorescence was read and the probability of DSB was calculated. This DNA dosimeter response was benchmarked against a Southern blot analysis technique for the measurement of DSB probability.
RESULTS: For the DNA dosimeter, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.043, 0.081, 0.149, 0.196, and 0.242, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.002, 0.003, 0.006, 0.005, and 0.011, respectively. For the Southern blot method, the probabilities of DSB at the dose levels of 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 Gy were 0.053, 0.105, 0.198, 0.235, and 0.264, respectively, and the standard errors of the mean were 0.013, 0.024, 0.040, 0.044, and 0.063, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A DNA dosimeter can accurately determine the probability of DNA double-strand break (DSB), one of the most toxic effects of radiotherapy, for absorbed radiation doses from 25 to 200 Gy. This is an important step in demonstrating the viability of DNA dosimeters as a measurement technique for radiation.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA dosimeter; Southern blot analysis; radiation dosimetry; radiation therapy measurements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29745994      PMCID: PMC6477916          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.

Authors:  P R Almond; P J Biggs; B M Coursey; W F Hanson; M S Huq; R Nath; D W Rogers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  B M Sutherland; P V Bennett; O Sidorkina; J Laval
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-performance liquid chromatography--tandem mass spectrometry measurement of radiation-induced base damage to isolated and cellular DNA.

Authors:  S Frelon; T Douki; J L Ravanat; J P Pouget; C Tornabene; J Cadet
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  Measurement of radiation-induced damage to DNA at the molecular level.

Authors:  M Dizdaroglu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals.

Authors:  T S Kumaravel; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Indra J Das; George X Ding; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  Peggy L Olive; Judit P Banáth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  DNA damage induced in cells by gamma and UVA radiation as measured by HPLC/GC-MS and HPLC-EC and Comet assay.

Authors:  J P Pouget; T Douki; M J Richard; J Cadet
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Andrzej Niemierko; Marek Ancukiewicz; Leo E Gerweck; Michael Goitein; Jay S Loeffler; Herman D Suit
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements.

Authors:  Paul A Jursinic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  A mechanistic mathematical model of initiation and malignant transformation in sporadic vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Chay Paterson; Ivana Bozic; Miriam J Smith; Xanthe Hoad; D Gareth R Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  DNA Dosimeter Measurement of Relative Biological Effectiveness for 160 kVp and 6 MV X Rays.

Authors:  Xiaolei Li; Kristen Alycia McConnell; Jun Che; Chul Soo Ha; Sang Eun Lee; Neil Kirby; Eun Yong Shim
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 3.  Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: Quantifying the Radiobiological Damage Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Chatzipapas; Panagiotis Papadimitroulas; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Spyridon A Kalospyros; Megumi Hada; Alexandros G Georgakilas; George C Kagadis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.