Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Literature DB >> 2709344

Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Abstract

1. Binaurally time-shifted and intensity-unbalanced noise, delivered through earphones, induced owls to respond with a head-orienting behavior similar to that which occurs to free field auditory stimuli. 2. Owls derived the azimuthal and elevational coordinates of a sound from a combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural intensity difference (IID). 3. IID and ITD each contained information about the azimuth and elevation of the signal. Thus, IID and ITD formed a coordinate system in which the axes were non-orthogonal. 4. ITD was a strong determinant of azimuth, and IID was a strong determinant of elevation, of elicited head turn.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 1989 PMID： 2709344 DOI： 10.1007/BF00614506

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comp Physiol A Impact factor: 1.836

12 in total

1. Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields.

Authors: A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1983-12 Impact factor: 6.167

2. Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors: T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1984-07 Impact factor: 6.167

3. Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors: W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1984-07 Impact factor: 6.167

4. Theory of binaural interaction based in auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position.

Authors: R M Stern; H S Colburn
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1978-07 Impact factor: 1.840

5. Stimulus factors which influence the perceived externalization of sound presented through headphones.

Authors: E T Levy; R A Butler
Journal: J Aud Res Date: 1978-01

6. Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl.

Authors: A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1981-01 Impact factor: 6.167

7. Monaural occlusion shifts receptive-field locations of auditory midbrain units in the owl.

Authors: E I Knudsen; M Konishi
Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 2.714

8. Vertical and horizontal sound localization in primates.

Authors: C H Brown; T Schessler; D Moody; W Stebbins
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1982-12 Impact factor: 1.840

9. Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets.

Authors: E R Hafter; R H Dye; R H Gilkey
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1979-02 Impact factor: 1.840

10. Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors: R S Payne
Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 1971-06 Impact factor: 3.312

41 in total

1. From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus.

Authors: David R Euston; Terry T Takahashi
Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 6.167

2. Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors: B J Arthur
Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Date: 2003-12-11 Impact factor: 1.836

3. Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors: María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.714

4. Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors: Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Date: 2006-09-26 Impact factor: 1.836

8. On the ability of neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to sense brief appearances of interaural time difference.

Authors: H Wagner
Journal: J Comp Physiol A Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 1.836

9. How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity.

Authors: J A Mazer
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10. Phantoms in the brain: ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish.

Authors: Bruce A Carlson
Journal: J Physiol Paris Date: 2008-11-01