Literature DB >> 11756512

From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus.

David R Euston1, Terry T Takahashi.   

Abstract

Space-specific neurons in the owl's inferior colliculus have spatial receptive fields (RFs) computed from interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences. Because of the shape of the owl's head, these cues vary with frequency in a manner specific for each location. We sought to determine the contribution of ILD to spatial selectivity. We measured the normal spatial receptive fields of space-specific neurons using virtual sound sources (i.e., noises filtered to simulate external sound sources, presented using headphones). The virtual-source filters were then altered so that ITD was fixed while frequency-specific ILDs varied according to location in the usual manner. The resulting "ILD-alone" RF typically revealed a horizontal band of excitation that included the normal RF. Above and below, the neurons were inhibited. Interestingly, the maxima of ILD-alone RFs were generally outside the normal RF, suggesting that space-specific neurons are not optimally tuned to the ILD spectrum occurring at the normal RF location. Congruously, frequency-specific ILD tuning, assessed with tones, better matched the ILDs at the peak of the ILD-alone RF than those at the peak of the normal RF. The firing evoked from the normal RF may thus reflect the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs needed to appropriately restrict the receptive field. Frequency-specific ILD tuning curves were combined with measured head-filtering characteristics to predict responses to the frequency-specific ILDs at each location. The predicted ILD-alone RFs, which are based on a simple sum of frequency-specific inputs, accounted for 56% of the variance in our measured ILD-alone RFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756512      PMCID: PMC6757622     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Directional sensitivity of neurons in the primary auditory (AI) cortex of the cat to successive sounds ordered in time and space.

Authors:  R A Reale; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual instruction of the neural map of auditory space in the developing optic tectum.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M S Brainard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Neural derivation of sound source location: resolution of spatial ambiguities in binaural cues.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen; S D Esterly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sensitive periods for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M S Brainard
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Virtual-space receptive fields of single auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  P W Poon; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Receptive fields and binaural interactions for virtual-space stimuli in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B Delgutte; P X Joris; R Y Litovsky; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of GABAergic inhibition in processing of interaural time difference in the owl's auditory system.

Authors:  I Fujita; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors:  B J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Linear summation in the barn owl's brainstem underlies responses to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Emergence of multiplicative auditory responses in the midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; José Luis Peña; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.