Literature DB >> 16721575

Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Mark von Campenhausen1, Hermann Wagner.   

Abstract

The barn owl, a nocturnal predator, derives its German name ("Schleiereule", direct English translation "veil owl") from the conspicuous ruff that covers the ear openings and gives the head a face-like appearance. The ruff is a specialization for the perception of sound. The densely-ramified reflector feathers forming the border of the ruff direct sound to the ear-openings. We studied the influence of the ruff on the behaviorally relevant sound-localization parameters interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD). The directionality of the ear was much greater when the ruff was intact than when the reflector feathers were removed. With ruff intact, the distribution of ILDs was oblique and the maximum ITD occurred around 110 degrees of azimuth. When all head feathers were removed, the steepest ILD gradient was much closer to the horizontal axis and ITD was maximal at 90 degrees . Many effects were frequency specific. Thus, the ruff reflects some properties of the human pinna. However, by shifting the point where ITD becomes maximal beyond 90 degrees , the ruff also introduces a break of the front-back symmetry of ITD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721575     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  27 in total

1.  Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of broadband interaural level different on head-turning behavior.

Authors:  I Poganiatz; H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Prediction of auditory spatial acuity from neural images on the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Avinash D S Bala; Matthew W Spitzer; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sound localization in chinchillas, III: Effect of pinna removal.

Authors:  R S Heffner; G Koay; H E Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound-localization deficits induced by lesions in the barn owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  23 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Side peak suppression in responses of an across-frequency integration model to stimuli of varying bandwidth as demonstrated analytically and by implementation.

Authors:  Tom Goeckel; Hartmut Führ; Gerhard Lakemeyer; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Relearning auditory spectral cues for locations inside and outside the visual field.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Toby Blackman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04

4.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  From optics to attention: visual perception in barn owls.

Authors:  Wolf M Harmening; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Maps of ITD in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.

Authors:  Catherine Carr; Sahil Shah; Go Ashida; Thomas McColgan; Hermann Wagner; Paula T Kuokkanen; Richard Kempter; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.