Literature DB >> 1762092

A temporal window for lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls.

H Wagner1.   

Abstract

Lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls (Tyto alba) was studied in a dichotic masking experiment. Sound bursts consisted of two parts: binaurally time-shifted noise, termed the probe, was inserted between masking noise. The owls indicated that they detected and lateralized the time-shift in the probe by a head turn in the direction predicted from sign of the time-shift. The general characteristics of head turns in response to this stimulus was similar to the head turns elicited by free-field stimulation or to head turns in response to presentation of the probe alone. The owls could easily lateralize stimuli containing long probes. The number of correct turns decreased as probe duration decreased, demonstrating that the masking noise interfered with the owls' ability to lateralize the probe. The minimal probe duration that the animals could lateralize ("minimal duration") became shorter as burst duration decreased. Minimal duration ranged from 1 ms to 15 ms for the two subjects and burst durations from 10 to 100 ms. These findings suggested that owls possess a temporal window. A fitting procedure proposed by Moore et al. (1988) was used to determine the shape of the temporal window. The fitting procedure showed that the shape of the owls' binaural temporal window could be described by the same algorithms as the human monaural temporal window. Thus, the temporal window is composed of a short time constant that determines the central part of the window, and a longer time constant that determines the shape at the skirts of the window.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1762092     DOI: 10.1007/bf00206992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  The shape of the ear's temporal window.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; C J Plack; A K Biswas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The critical masking interval.

Authors:  M J Penner; C E Robinson; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound intensity processing by the goldfish.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal switching between binaural information sources.

Authors:  I Pollack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal integration of acoustic signals by the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  R J Dooling; M H Searcy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural maps of interaural time and intensity differences in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  J F Olsen; E I Knudsen; S D Esterly
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Gap detection by the chinchilla.

Authors:  D Giraudi; R Salvi; D Henderson; R Hamernik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  On the ability of neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to sense brief appearances of interaural time difference.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Azimuthal sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Psychophysical results.

Authors:  Arne Feinkohl; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Spatial hearing in echoic environments: the role of the envelope in owls.

Authors:  Brian S Nelson; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-17

5.  Exploring binaural hearing in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) using virtual headphones.

Authors:  Sandra Tolnai; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The barn owls' Minimum Audible Angle.

Authors:  Bianca Krumm; Georg M Klump; Christine Köppl; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.