Literature DB >> 14669025

Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

B J Arthur1.   

Abstract

Barn owls use interaural intensity differences to localize sounds in the vertical plane. At a given elevation the magnitude of the interaural intensity difference cue varies with frequency, creating an interaural intensity difference spectrum of cues which is characteristic of that direction. To test whether space-specific cells are sensitive to spectral interaural intensity difference cues, pure-tone interaural intensity difference tuning curves were taken at multiple different frequencies for single neurons in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus. For a given neuron, the interaural intensity differences eliciting the maximum response (the best interaural intensity differences) changed with the frequency of the stimulus by an average maximal difference of 9.4+/-6.2 dB. The resulting spectral patterns of these neurally preferred interaural intensity differences exhibited a high degree of similarity to the acoustic interaural intensity difference spectra characteristic of restricted regions in space. Compared to stimuli whose interaural intensity difference spectra matched the preferred spectra, stimuli with inverted spectra elicited a smaller response, showing that space-specific neurons are sensitive to the shape of the spectrum. The underlying mechanism is an inhibition for frequency-specific interaural intensity differences which differ from the preferred spectral pattern. Collectively, these data show that space-specific neurons are sensitive to spectral interaural intensity difference cues and support the idea that behaving barn owls use such cues to precisely localize sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14669025     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0476-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  24 in total

1.  Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of broadband interaural level different on head-turning behavior.

Authors:  I Poganiatz; H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Neural network models of sound localization based on directional filtering by the pinna.

Authors:  C Neti; E D Young; M H Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The auditory periphery of the ferret. I: Directional response properties and the pattern of interaural level differences.

Authors:  S Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Inhibition sensitive to interaural time difference in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Y Albeck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A performance adequate computational model for auditory localization.

Authors:  W Chung; S Carlile; P Leong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  G A Manley; C Köppl; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binaural gain modulation of spectrotemporal tuning in the interaural level difference-coding pathway.

Authors:  Louisa J Steinberg; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Dylan Rich; Fanny Cazettes; Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Difference in response reliability predicted by spectrotemporal tuning in the cochlear nuclei of barn owls.

Authors:  Louisa J Steinberg; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Emergence of multiplicative auditory responses in the midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; José Luis Peña; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.