Literature DB >> 18984041

Phantoms in the brain: ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish.

Bruce A Carlson1.   

Abstract

In wave-type weakly electric fish, two distinct types of primary afferent fibers are specialized for separately encoding modulations in the amplitude and phase (timing) of electrosensory stimuli. Time-coding afferents phase lock to periodic stimuli and respond to changes in stimulus phase with shifts in spike timing. Amplitude-coding afferents fire sporadically to periodic stimuli. Their probability of firing in a given cycle, and therefore their firing rate, is proportional to stimulus amplitude. However, the spike times of time-coding afferents are also affected by changes in amplitude; similarly, the firing rates of amplitude-coding afferents are also affected by changes in phase. Because identical changes in the activity of an individual primary afferent can be caused by modulations in either the amplitude or phase of stimuli, there is ambiguity regarding the information content of primary afferent responses that can result in 'phantom' modulations not present in an actual stimulus. Central electrosensory neurons in the hindbrain and midbrain respond to these phantom modulations. Phantom modulations can also elicit behavioral responses, indicating that ambiguity in the encoding of amplitude and timing information ultimately distorts electrosensory perception. A lack of independence in the encoding of multiple stimulus attributes can therefore result in perceptual illusions. Similar effects may occur in other sensory systems as well. In particular, the vertebrate auditory system is thought to be phylogenetically related to the electrosensory system and it encodes information about amplitude and timing in similar ways. It has been well established that pitch perception and loudness perception are both affected by the frequency and intensity of sounds, raising the intriguing possibility that auditory perception may also be affected by ambiguity in the encoding of sound amplitude and timing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984041      PMCID: PMC2669179          DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol Paris        ISSN: 0928-4257


  78 in total

Review 1.  Information theory and neural coding.

Authors:  A Borst; F E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Factors affecting footsteps: contrast can change the apparent speed, amplitude and direction of motion.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sound-intensity-dependent compensation for the small interaural time difference cue for sound source localization.

Authors:  Eri Nishino; Rei Yamada; Hiroshi Kuba; Hiroyuki Hioki; Takahiro Furuta; Takeshi Kaneko; Harunori Ohmori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Convergent designs for electrogenesis and electroreception.

Authors:  C D Hopkins
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Sensory hyperacuity in the jamming avoidance response of weakly electric fish.

Authors:  M Kawasaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Neural coding of difference frequencies in the midbrain of the electric fish Eigenmannia: reading the sense of rotation in an amplitude-phase plane.

Authors:  G Rose; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia.

Authors:  H Scheich; T H Bullock; R H Hamstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A time-comparison circuit in the electric fish midbrain. I. Behavior and physiology.

Authors:  C E Carr; W Heiligenberg; G J Rose
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The jamming avoidance response in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia. A behavior controlled by distributed evaluation of electroreceptive afferences.

Authors:  W Heiligenberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1980-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.