Literature DB >> 6737041

Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

W E Sullivan, M Konishi.   

Abstract

The cochlear nucleus of the barn owl is composed of two anatomically distinct subnuclei, n. magnocellularis (the magnocellular nucleus) and n. angularis (the angular nucleus). In the magnocellular nucleus, neurons tend to respond at a particular phase of a stimulus sine wave. Phase locking was observed for frequencies up to 9.0 kHz. The intensity-spike count functions of magnocellular units are characterized by high rates of spontaneous activity, a narrow range of intensities over which spike counts changed from spontaneous to saturation levels, and a small increase in spike counts with intensity over that range. In the angular nucleus, neurons showed little or no tendency to respond at a certain sinusoidal phase, although some showed weak phase locking for frequencies below 3.5 kHz. Angular units typically had low spontaneous rates, large dynamic ranges, and large increases in spike counts with intensity, resulting in high saturation levels. The clear difference between the two nuclei in sensitivity to both phase and intensity and the reciprocity in response properties support the hypothesis that each nucleus is specialized to process one parameter (phase or intensity) and not the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6737041      PMCID: PMC6564872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  93 in total

1.  GABAergic inhibition in nucleus magnocellularis: implications for phase locking in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  P Monsivais; L Yang; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  L Yang; P Monsivais; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

Authors:  J L Pena; S Viete; K Funabiki; K Saberi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Localization of KCNC1 (Kv3.1) potassium channel subunits in the avian auditory nucleus magnocellularis and nucleus laminaris during development.

Authors:  Suchitra Parameshwaran-Iyer; Catherine E Carr; Teresa M Perney
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2003-05

6.  Computational diversity in the cochlear nucleus angularis of the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensory receptor diversity establishes a peripheral population code for stimulus duration at low intensities.

Authors:  Ariel M Lyons-Warren; Michael Hollmann; Bruce A Carlson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 9.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.