Literature DB >> 16424454

Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

María Lucía Pérez1, José Luis Peña.   

Abstract

Spatial receptive fields of neurons in the auditory pathway of the barn owl result from the sensitivity to combinations of interaural time (ITD) and level differences across stimulus frequency. Both the forebrain and tectum of the owl contain such neurons. The neural pathways, which lead to the forebrain and tectal representations of auditory space, separate before the midbrain map of auditory space is synthesized. The first nuclei that belong exclusively to either the forebrain or the tectal pathways are the nucleus ovoidalis (Ov) and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx), respectively. Both receive projections from the lateral shell subdivision of the inferior colliculus but are not interconnected. Previous studies indicate that the owl's tectal representation of auditory space is different from those found in the owl's forebrain and the mammalian brain. We addressed the question of whether the computation of spatial cues in both pathways is the same by comparing the ITD tuning of Ov and ICx neurons. Unlike in ICx, the relationship between frequency and ITD tuning had not been studied in single Ov units. In contrast to the conspicuous frequency independent ITD tuning of space-specific neurons of ICx, ITD selectivity varied with frequency in Ov. We also observed that the spatially tuned neurons of Ov respond to lower frequencies and are more broadly tuned to ITD than in ICx. Thus there are differences in the integration of frequency and ITD in the two sound-localization pathways. Thalamic neurons integrate spatial information not only within a broader frequency band but also across ITD channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16424454      PMCID: PMC2532520          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00833.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Role of commissural projections in the representation of bilateral auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; H Wagner; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-03-22       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  G A Manley; C Köppl; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing.

Authors:  S E Petersen; P T Fox; M I Posner; M Mintun; M E Raichle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain.

Authors:  T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  H Wagner; T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal lobe lesions and perception of species-specific vocalizations by macaques.

Authors:  H E Heffner; R S Heffner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Space-mapped auditory projections from the inferior colliculus to the optic tectum in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  E I Knudsen; P F Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  10 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Authors:  Shai Netser; Yael Zahar; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Direction selectivity mediated by adaptation in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Cue Reliability Represented in the Shape of Tuning Curves in the Owl's Sound Localization System.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spatial cue reliability drives frequency tuning in the barn Owl's midbrain.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Pena
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Distinct Correlation Structure Supporting a Rate-Code for Sound Localization in the Owl's Auditory Forebrain.

Authors:  Michael V Beckert; Rodrigo Pavão; José L Peña
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-06-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.