Literature DB >> 2286242

Neural mechanisms of directional hearing in the pigeon.

J Lewald1.   

Abstract

The directional sensitivity of single auditory neurons in the midbrain (Nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis pars dorsalis) of the pigeon (Columba livia) was studied, using acoustic free-field stimulation (usually pure tones) in the frontal hemifield. Of a total of 337 units, 84.6% showed statistically significant changes of their responses as a function of sound azimuth. Of these, most units respond maximally to sounds in a particular azimuthal range, each has its "best area". These neurons were classified into four classes according to the properties of their best areas: (1) contralateral neurons (53.4%); (2) ipsilateral neurons (6.2%); (3) frontal neurons (18.1%); and (4) complex neurons (3.3%). The first two showed only one border of the best area within the frontal hemifield, with an increase of response strength towards the contralateral and the ipsilateral side, respectively; with frontal neurons, the best area was bounded towards both sides within the frontal hemifield, whereas the complex neurons had two or more separated best areas or extensive frontal inhibitory areas. In the remaining units (3.6%), termed weakly directional neurons, changes of their discharge rate depending on sound azimuth were statistically significant, but too poor to determine any best areas. There was a significant under-representation of best frequencies in the mid-frequency range (1-2 kHz) with a minimum in the relative number of MLD neurons recorded from at 2 kHz. However, the directional sensitivity of the neurons quantified by analysing different parameters of the directional diagrams (dynamic range, roll-off steepness, best area width) was undiminished in the mid-frequency range. In several experiments, in addition to the neurons' directional sensitivity in free-field sound, their sensitivity to interaural ongoing time (phase) differences (OTDs) and interaural intensity differences (IIDs) were also tested, using dichotic stimulation (pure tones) by headphones. Directional sensitive neurons tuned to low frequencies (best frequency less than 2 kHz) were either sensitive exclusively to OTDs or to both OTDs and IIDs; the ranges of best OTDs were correlated significantly with the azimuthal position of the best area. "High frequency" units (best frequency greater than 2 kHz) were sensitive to IIDs but not to OTDs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2286242     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Neuroanatomical basis of binaural phase-difference analysis for sound localization: a comparative study.

Authors:  B Masterton; G C Thompson; J K Bechtold; M J RoBards
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-07

2.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Neuronal coding of azimuthal sound direction in the auditory midbrain of the pigeon.

Authors:  J Lewald
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1988-09

4.  Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The statistical significance of the peristimulus time histogram (PSTH).

Authors:  G H Dörrscheidt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The organization of the ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia). I. Diencephalic projections of the inferior colliculus (nucleus mesencephali lateralis, pars dorsalis).

Authors:  H J Karten
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Subdivisions of the inferior colliculus in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of sound direction on the processing of amplitude-modulated signals in the frog inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J Xu; D M Gooler; A S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Azimuthal sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Physical binaural cues.

Authors:  G M Klump; O N Larsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Connections of the auditory brainstem in a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. I. Projections of nucleus angularis and nucleus laminaris to the auditory torus.

Authors:  Nils O E Krützfeldt; Priscilla Logerot; M Fabiana Kubke; J Martin Wild
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 4.  Incidental sounds of locomotion in animal cognition.

Authors:  Matz Larsson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Molecular mapping of movement-associated areas in the avian brain: a motor theory for vocal learning origin.

Authors:  Gesa Feenders; Miriam Liedvogel; Miriam Rivas; Manuela Zapka; Haruhito Horita; Erina Hara; Kazuhiro Wada; Henrik Mouritsen; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A high sensitivity ZENK monoclonal antibody to map neuronal activity in Aves.

Authors:  Gregory Charles Nordmann; Erich Pascal Malkemper; Lukas Landler; Lyubov Ushakova; Simon Nimpf; Robert Heinen; Stefan Schuechner; Egon Ogris; David Anthony Keays
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.