Literature DB >> 9724807

How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity.

J A Mazer1.   

Abstract

The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (ITD) cues to localize sounds in the horizontal plane. Low-order binaural auditory neurons with sharp frequency tuning act as narrow-band coincidence detectors; such neurons respond equally well to sounds with a particular ITD and its phase equivalents and are said to be phase ambiguous. Higher-order neurons with broad frequency tuning are unambiguously selective for single ITDs in response to broad-band sounds and show little or no response to phase equivalents. Selectivity for single ITDs is thought to arise from the convergence of parallel, narrow-band frequency channels that originate in the cochlea. ITD tuning to variable bandwidth stimuli was measured in higher-order neurons of the owl's inferior colliculus to examine the rules that govern the relationship between frequency channel convergence and the resolution of phase ambiguity. Ambiguity decreased as stimulus bandwidth increased, reaching a minimum at 2-3 kHz. Two independent mechanisms appear to contribute to the elimination of ambiguity: one suppressive and one facilitative. The integration of information carried by parallel, distributed processing channels is a common theme of sensory processing that spans both modality and species boundaries. The principles underlying the resolution of phase ambiguity and frequency channel convergence in the owl may have implications for other sensory systems, such as electrolocation in electric fish and the computation of binocular disparity in the avian and mammalian visual systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9724807      PMCID: PMC27998          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  A topographic representation of auditory space in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  K E Binns; S Grant; D J Withington; M J Keating
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-09-04       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem.

Authors:  E M Overholt; E W Rubel; R L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Lateralization of bands of noise: effects of bandwidth and differences of interaural time and phase.

Authors:  C Trahiotis; R M Stern
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Projections of nucleus angularis and nucleus laminaris to the lateral lemniscal nuclear complex of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Role of commissural projections in the representation of bilateral auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; H Wagner; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-03-22       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses to wideband noise.

Authors:  T C Yin; J C Chan; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive.

Authors:  P H Smith; P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-05-08       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  21 in total

1.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Side peak suppression in responses of an across-frequency integration model to stimuli of varying bandwidth as demonstrated analytically and by implementation.

Authors:  Tom Goeckel; Hartmut Führ; Gerhard Lakemeyer; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Direction selectivity mediated by adaptation in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.