Xinqiang Yan1,2, Zhipeng Cao1,3, William A Grissom1,2,3,4. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 4. Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To implement and validate a hardware-based array-compressed parallel transmission (acpTx) system. METHODS: In array-compressed parallel transmission, a small number of transmit channels drive a larger number of transmit coils, which are connected via an array compression network that implements optimized coil-to-channel combinations. A two channel-to-eight coil array compression network was developed using power splitters, attenuators and phase shifters, and a simulation was performed to investigate the effects of coil coupling on power dissipation in a simplified network. An eight coil transmit array was constructed using induced current elimination decoupling, and the coil and network were validated in benchtop measurements, B1+ mapping scans, and an accelerated spiral excitation experiment. RESULTS: The developed attenuators came within 0.08 dB of the desired attenuations, and reflection coefficients were -22 dB or better. The simulation demonstrated that up to 3× more power was dissipated in the network when coils were poorly isolated (-9.6 dB), versus well-isolated (-31 dB). Compared to split circularly-polarized coil combinations, the additional degrees of freedom provided by the array compression network led to 54% lower squared excitation error in the spiral experiment. CONCLUSION: Array-compressed parallel transmission was successfully implemented in a hardware system. Further work is needed to develop remote network tuning and to minimize network power dissipation. Magn Reson Med 75:2545-2552, 2016.
PURPOSE: To implement and validate a hardware-based array-compressed parallel transmission (acpTx) system. METHODS: In array-compressed parallel transmission, a small number of transmit channels drive a larger number of transmit coils, which are connected via an array compression network that implements optimized coil-to-channel combinations. A two channel-to-eight coil array compression network was developed using power splitters, attenuators and phase shifters, and a simulation was performed to investigate the effects of coil coupling on power dissipation in a simplified network. An eight coil transmit array was constructed using induced current elimination decoupling, and the coil and network were validated in benchtop measurements, B1+ mapping scans, and an accelerated spiral excitation experiment. RESULTS: The developed attenuators came within 0.08 dB of the desired attenuations, and reflection coefficients were -22 dB or better. The simulation demonstrated that up to 3× more power was dissipated in the network when coils were poorly isolated (-9.6 dB), versus well-isolated (-31 dB). Compared to split circularly-polarized coil combinations, the additional degrees of freedom provided by the array compression network led to 54% lower squared excitation error in the spiral experiment. CONCLUSION: Array-compressed parallel transmission was successfully implemented in a hardware system. Further work is needed to develop remote network tuning and to minimize network power dissipation. Magn Reson Med 75:2545-2552, 2016.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William Grissom; Chun-yu Yip; Zhenghui Zhang; V Andrew Stenger; Jeffrey A Fessler; Douglas C Noll Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Graeme A Keith; Christopher T Rodgers; Aaron T Hess; Carl J Snyder; J Thomas Vaughan; Matthew D Robson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.668