Yue Zhu1,2, Ming Lu1,2, William A Grissom1,2,3, John C Gore1,2,3, Xinqiang Yan1,2. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A ratio adjustable power splitter (RAPS) circuit was recently proposed for add-on RF shimming and array-compressed parallel transmission. Here we propose a new RAPS circuit design based on off-the-shelf components for improved performance and manufacturability. THEORY AND METHODS: The original RAPS used a pair of home-built Wilkinson splitter and hybrid coupler connected by a pair of connectorized coaxial cables. Here we propose a new hybrid-pair RAPS (or HP-RAPS) circuit that replaces the home-built circuits with two commercially available hybrid couplers and replaces connectorized cables with interchangeable microstrip lines. We derive the relation between the desired splitting ratio and the required phase shifts for HP-RAPS and investigate how to generate arbitrary splitting ratios using paired meandering and straight lines. Several HP-RAPSs with different splitting ratios were fabricated and tested on the workbench and MRI experiments. RESULTS: The splitting ratio of an HP-RAPS circuit has a tan or cot dependence on the meandering line's additional length compared to the straight line. The fabricated HP-RAPSs exhibit accurate splitting ratios as expected (<4% deviations) and generate transmit fields that well agree with predicted fields. They also demonstrated a low insertion loss of 0.33 dB, high output isolation of -26 dB, and acceptable impedance matching of -16 dB. CONCLUSION: A novel HP-RAPS circuit was developed and implemented. It is easy-to-fabricate/reproduce with minimal expertise. It also preserves the features of the original RAPS circuit (ratio-adjustable, small footprint, etc.) with lower insertion loss.
PURPOSE: A ratio adjustable power splitter (RAPS) circuit was recently proposed for add-on RF shimming and array-compressed parallel transmission. Here we propose a new RAPS circuit design based on off-the-shelf components for improved performance and manufacturability. THEORY AND METHODS: The original RAPS used a pair of home-built Wilkinson splitter and hybrid coupler connected by a pair of connectorized coaxial cables. Here we propose a new hybrid-pair RAPS (or HP-RAPS) circuit that replaces the home-built circuits with two commercially available hybrid couplers and replaces connectorized cables with interchangeable microstrip lines. We derive the relation between the desired splitting ratio and the required phase shifts for HP-RAPS and investigate how to generate arbitrary splitting ratios using paired meandering and straight lines. Several HP-RAPSs with different splitting ratios were fabricated and tested on the workbench and MRI experiments. RESULTS: The splitting ratio of an HP-RAPS circuit has a tan or cot dependence on the meandering line's additional length compared to the straight line. The fabricated HP-RAPSs exhibit accurate splitting ratios as expected (<4% deviations) and generate transmit fields that well agree with predicted fields. They also demonstrated a low insertion loss of 0.33 dB, high output isolation of -26 dB, and acceptable impedance matching of -16 dB. CONCLUSION: A novel HP-RAPS circuit was developed and implemented. It is easy-to-fabricate/reproduce with minimal expertise. It also preserves the features of the original RAPS circuit (ratio-adjustable, small footprint, etc.) with lower insertion loss.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.668