Literature DB >> 26219298

Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Yong Jiang1, Jochen C Reif2.   

Abstract

Modeling epistasis in genomic selection is impeded by a high computational load. The extended genomic best linear unbiased prediction (EG-BLUP) with an epistatic relationship matrix and the reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression (RKHS) are two attractive approaches that reduce the computational load. In this study, we proved the equivalence of EG-BLUP and genomic selection approaches, explicitly modeling epistatic effects. Moreover, we have shown why the RKHS model based on a Gaussian kernel captures epistatic effects among markers. Using experimental data sets in wheat and maize, we compared different genomic selection approaches and concluded that prediction accuracy can be improved by modeling epistasis for selfing species but may not for outcrossing species.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GenPred; epistasis; extended G-BLUP (EG-BLUP); genomic best linear unbiased prediction (G-BLUP); genomic selection; reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression (RKHS); shared data resource

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26219298      PMCID: PMC4596682          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.177907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  38 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection.

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Lina Jacobsson; Per Ahgren; Paul Siegel; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Genomic value prediction for quantitative traits under the epistatic model.

Authors:  Zhiqiu Hu; Yongguang Li; Xiaohui Song; Yingpeng Han; Xiaodong Cai; Shizhong Xu; Wenbin Li
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.

Authors:  Réka Howard; Alicia L Carriquiry; William D Beavis
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  87 in total

1.  Misspecification in Mixed-Model-Based Association Analysis.

Authors:  Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Andrés Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.

Authors:  José Crossa; Johannes W R Martini; Daniel Gianola; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Diego Jarquin; Philomin Juliana; Osval Montesinos-López; Jaime Cuevas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Homeologous Epistasis in Wheat: The Search for an Immortal Hybrid.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark Sorrells
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of omics Data Can Improve Prediction of Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Matthias Westhues; Wolfgang Schipprack; Felix Seifert; Alexander Thiemann; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic Variance Partitioning and Genome-Wide Prediction with Allele Dosage Information in Autotetraploid Potato.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Cari A Schmitz Carley; Paul C Bethke; Joseph J Coombs; Mark E Clough; Washington L da Silva; Walter S De Jong; David S Douches; Curtis M Frederick; Kathleen G Haynes; David G Holm; J Creighton Miller; Patricio R Muñoz; Felix M Navarro; Richard G Novy; Jiwan P Palta; Gregory A Porter; Kyle T Rak; Vidyasagar R Sathuvalli; Asunta L Thompson; G Craig Yencho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.

Authors:  Christina Lehermeier; Simon Teyssèdre; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.