Literature DB >> 32973077

Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Yong Jiang1, Jochen C Reif1.   

Abstract

The genomic relationship matrix plays a key role in the analysis of genetic diversity, genomic prediction, and genome-wide association studies. The epistatic genomic relationship matrix is a natural generalization of the classic genomic relationship matrix in the sense that it implicitly models the epistatic effects among all markers. Calculating the exact form of the epistatic relationship matrix requires high computational load, and is hence not feasible when the number of markers is large, or when high-degree of epistasis is in consideration. Currently, many studies use the Hadamard product of the classic genomic relationship matrix as an approximation. However, the quality of the approximation is difficult to investigate in the strict mathematical sense. In this study, we derived iterative formulas for the precise form of the epistatic genomic relationship matrix for arbitrary degree of epistasis including both additive and dominance interactions. The key to our theoretical results is the observation of an interesting link between the elements in the genomic relationship matrix and symmetric polynomials, which motivated the application of the corresponding mathematical theory. Based on the iterative formulas, efficient recursive algorithms were implemented. Compared with the approximation by the Hadamard product, our algorithms provided a complete solution to the problem of calculating the exact epistatic genomic relationship matrix. As an application, we showed that our new algorithms easily relieved the computational burden in a previous study on the approximation behavior of two limit models.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  epistasis; genomic relationship; high-order interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32973077      PMCID: PMC7648578          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  41 in total

1.  Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Zuo Li; Guozheng Liu; Yong Jiang; Hans Peter Maurer; Tobias Würschum; Hans-Peter Mock; Andrea Matros; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ralf Schachschneider; Ebrahim Kazman; Johannes Schacht; Manje Gowda; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling quantitative trait Loci and interpretation of models.

Authors:  Zhao-Bang Zeng; Tao Wang; Wei Zou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu; Dan Zhu; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Renate H Schmidt; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Kernel-based variance component estimation and whole-genome prediction of pre-corrected phenotypes and progeny tests for dairy cow health traits.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Prashanth Boddhireddy; Natascha Vukasinovic; Daniel Gianola; Sue Denise
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Genomic prediction with epistasis models: on the marker-coding-dependent performance of the extended GBLUP and properties of the categorical epistasis model (CE).

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; Diercles F Cardoso; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Henner Simianer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Antonio Reverter; William Herring; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Haplotype-Based Genome-Wide Prediction Models Exploit Local Epistatic Interactions Among Markers.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Renate H Schmidt; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A rapid epistatic mixed-model association analysis by linear retransformations of genomic estimated values.

Authors:  Chao Ning; Dan Wang; Huimin Kang; Raphael Mrode; Lei Zhou; Shizhong Xu; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Andres Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Genomic prediction with non-additive effects in beef cattle: stability of variance component and genetic effect estimates against population size.

Authors:  Akio Onogi; Toshio Watanabe; Atsushi Ogino; Kazuhito Kurogi; Kenji Togashi
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Accounting for epistasis improves genomic prediction of phenotypes with univariate and bivariate models across environments.

Authors:  Elaheh Vojgani; Torsten Pook; Johannes W R Martini; Armin C Hölker; Manfred Mayer; Chris-Carolin Schön; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.699

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.