Literature DB >> 31921277

Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.

José Crossa1,2, Johannes W R Martini1, Daniel Gianola3, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez2, Diego Jarquin4, Philomin Juliana1, Osval Montesinos-López5, Jaime Cuevas6.   

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) is a promising method for genomic-enabled prediction. However, the implementation of DL is difficult because many hyperparameters (number of hidden layers, number of neurons, learning rate, number of epochs, batch size, etc.) need to be tuned. For this reason, deep kernel methods, which only require defining the number of layers, may be an attractive alternative. Deep kernel methods emulate DL models with a large number of neurons, but are defined by relatively easily computed covariance matrices. In this research, we compared the genome-based prediction of DL to a deep kernel (arc-cosine kernel, AK), to the commonly used non-additive Gaussian kernel (GK), as well as to the conventional additive genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP/GB). We used two real wheat data sets for benchmarking these methods. On average, AK and GK outperformed DL and GB. The gain in terms of prediction performance of AK and GK over DL and GB was not large, but AK and GK have the advantage that only one parameter, the number of layers (AK) or the bandwidth parameter (GK), has to be tuned in each method. Furthermore, although AK and GK had similar performance, deep kernel AK is easier to implement than GK, since the parameter "number of layers" is more easily determined than the bandwidth parameter of GK. Comparing AK and DL for the data set of year 2015-2016, the difference in performance of the two methods was bigger, with AK predicting much better than DL. On this data, the optimization of the hyperparameters for DL was difficult and the finally used parameters may have been suboptimal. Our results suggest that AK is a good alternative to DL with the advantage that practically no tuning process is required.
Copyright © 2019 Crossa, Martini, Gianola, Pérez-Rodríguez, Jarquin, Juliana, Montesinos-López and Cuevas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial neural networks; deep kernel; deep learning; genomic selection; genomic × environment interaction; kernel methods

Year:  2019        PMID: 31921277      PMCID: PMC6913188          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  26 in total

1.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Rohan L Fernando; Alessandra Stella
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models.

Authors:  Jaime Cuevas; José Crossa; Víctor Soberanis; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Gustavo de Los Campos; O A Montesinos-López; Juan Burgueño
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 4.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.

Authors:  Jaime Cuevas; José Crossa; Osval A Montesinos-López; Juan Burgueño; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; Jaime Cuevas; Evellyn Giselly de Oliveira Couto; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Diego Jarquín; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Juan Burgueño; Jose Crossa
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  New Deep Learning Genomic-Based Prediction Model for Multiple Traits with Binary, Ordinal, and Continuous Phenotypes.

Authors:  Osval A Montesinos-López; Javier Martín-Vallejo; José Crossa; Daniel Gianola; Carlos M Hernández-Suárez; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Philomin Juliana; Ravi Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Genomic-Enabled Prediction Kernel Models with Random Intercepts for Multi-environment Trials.

Authors:  Jaime Cuevas; Italo Granato; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Osval A Montesinos-Lopez; Juan Burgueño; Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; José Crossa
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Multi-environment Genomic Prediction of Plant Traits Using Deep Learners With Dense Architecture.

Authors:  Abelardo Montesinos-López; Osval A Montesinos-López; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Carlos M Hernández-Suárez
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A Benchmarking Between Deep Learning, Support Vector Machine and Bayesian Threshold Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Predicting Ordinal Traits in Plant Breeding.

Authors:  Osval A Montesinos-López; Javier Martín-Vallejo; José Crossa; Daniel Gianola; Carlos M Hernández-Suárez; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Philomin Juliana; Ravi Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  13 in total

1.  Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.

Authors:  Réka Howard; Diego Jarquin; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  NeuralLasso: Neural Networks Meet Lasso in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Boby Mathew; Andreas Hauptmann; Jens Léon; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Plant Genotype to Phenotype Prediction Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Monica F Danilevicz; Mitchell Gill; Robyn Anderson; Jacqueline Batley; Mohammed Bennamoun; Philipp E Bayer; David Edwards
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; José Alberto Barrón-López; Johannes W R Martini; Silvia Berenice Fajardo-Flores; Laura S Gaytan-Lugo; Pedro C Santana-Mancilla; José Crossa
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Genome-Based Genotype × Environment Prediction Enhances Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Improvement Using Pseudo-Diploid and Polysomic Tetraploid Modeling.

Authors:  Rodomiro Ortiz; José Crossa; Fredrik Reslow; Paulino Perez-Rodriguez; Jaime Cuevas
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Harnessing translational research in wheat for climate resilience.

Authors:  Matthew P Reynolds; Janet M Lewis; Karim Ammar; Bhoja R Basnet; Leonardo Crespo-Herrera; José Crossa; Kanwarpal S Dhugga; Susanne Dreisigacker; Philomin Juliana; Hannes Karwat; Masahiro Kishii; Margaret R Krause; Peter Langridge; Azam Lashkari; Suchismita Mondal; Thomas Payne; Diego Pequeno; Francisco Pinto; Carolina Sansaloni; Urs Schulthess; Ravi P Singh; Kai Sonder; Sivakumar Sukumaran; Wei Xiong; Hans J Braun
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 9.  Modern Strategies to Assess and Breed Forest Tree Adaptation to Changing Climate.

Authors:  Andrés J Cortés; Manuela Restrepo-Montoya; Larry E Bedoya-Canas
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Harnessing Crop Wild Diversity for Climate Change Adaptation.

Authors:  Andrés J Cortés; Felipe López-Hernández
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.