Literature DB >> 29363551

Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of omics Data Can Improve Prediction of Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Tobias A Schrag1, Matthias Westhues1, Wolfgang Schipprack1, Felix Seifert2, Alexander Thiemann2, Stefan Scholten1, Albrecht E Melchinger3.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the agronomic performance of single-crosses with high precision is essential for selecting superior candidates for hybrid breeding. With recent technological advances, thousands of new parent lines, and, consequently, millions of new hybrid combinations are possible in each breeding cycle, yet only a few hundred can be produced and phenotyped in multi-environment yield trials. Well established prediction approaches such as best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using pedigree data and whole-genome prediction using genomic data are limited in capturing epistasis and interactions occurring within and among downstream biological strata such as transcriptome and metabolome. Because mRNA and small RNA (sRNA) sequences are involved in transcriptional, translational and post-translational processes, we expect them to provide information influencing several biological strata. However, using sRNA data of parent lines to predict hybrid performance has not yet been addressed. Here, we gathered genomic, transcriptomic (mRNA and sRNA) and metabolomic data of parent lines to evaluate the ability of the data to predict the performance of untested hybrids for important agronomic traits in grain maize. We found a considerable interaction for predictive ability between predictor and trait, with mRNA data being a superior predictor for grain yield and genomic data for grain dry matter content, while sRNA performed relatively poorly for both traits. Combining mRNA and genomic data as predictors resulted in high predictive abilities across both traits and combining other predictors improved prediction over that of the individual predictors alone. We conclude that downstream "omics" can complement genomics for hybrid prediction, and, thereby, contribute to more efficient selection of hybrid candidates.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BLUP; GenPred; Genomic Selection; Shared Data Resources; genomic prediction; genomic selection; hybrid performance; maize; omics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363551      PMCID: PMC5887136          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  51 in total

1.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  High-density kinetic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis to eight environmental conditions.

Authors:  Camila Caldana; Thomas Degenkolbe; Alvaro Cuadros-Inostroza; Sebastian Klie; Ronan Sulpice; Andrea Leisse; Dirk Steinhauser; Alisdair R Fernie; Lothar Willmitzer; Matthew A Hannah
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 4.  The functions of plant small RNAs in development and in stress responses.

Authors:  Shengjun Li; Claudia Castillo-González; Bin Yu; Xiuren Zhang
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Changes in genetic diversity in the red winter wheat regions of the United States.

Authors:  T S Cox; J P Murphy; D M Rodgers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction.

Authors:  Timothy Kelliher; Dakota Starr; Lee Richbourg; Satya Chintamanani; Brent Delzer; Michael L Nuccio; Julie Green; Zhongying Chen; Jamie McCuiston; Wenling Wang; Tara Liebler; Paul Bullock; Barry Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The expanding world of small RNAs in plants.

Authors:  Filipe Borges; Robert A Martienssen
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Omics-based hybrid prediction in maize.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Tobias A Schrag; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; H Friedrich Utz; Wolfgang Schipprack; Alexander Thiemann; Felix Seifert; Anita Ehret; Armin Schlereth; Mark Stitt; Zoran Nikoloski; Lothar Willmitzer; Chris C Schön; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Post-Translational Dosage Compensation Buffers Genetic Perturbations to Stoichiometry of Protein Complexes.

Authors:  Koji Ishikawa; Koji Makanae; Shintaro Iwasaki; Nicholas T Ingolia; Hisao Moriya
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  43 in total

1.  Identification of optimal prediction models using multi-omic data for selecting hybrid rice.

Authors:  Shibo Wang; Julong Wei; Ruidong Li; Han Qu; John M Chater; Renyuan Ma; Yonghao Li; Weibo Xie; Zhenyu Jia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Transcriptome-Based Prediction of Complex Traits in Maize.

Authors:  Christina B Azodi; Jeremy Pardo; Robert VanBuren; Gustavo de Los Campos; Shin-Han Shiu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Phenomic Selection: A New and Efficient Alternative to Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Charlotte Brault; Renaud Rincent; Vincent Segura
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Incorporation of parental phenotypic data into multi-omic models improves prediction of yield-related traits in hybrid rice.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Yue Zhao; Xin Wang; Ying Ma; Pengcheng Li; Zefeng Yang; Xuecai Zhang; Chenwu Xu; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Genomic predictions for enteric methane production are improved by metabolome and microbiome data in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ross; Ben J Hayes; David Tucker; Jude Bond; Stuart E Denman; Victor Hutton Oddy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.

Authors:  Pedro C Brauner; Dominik Müller; Willem S Molenaar; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.

Authors:  Danilo Hottis Lyra; Giovanni Galli; Filipe Couto Alves; Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato; Miriam Suzane Vidotti; Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; Júlia Silva Morosini; José Crossa; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Across-years prediction of hybrid performance in maize using genomics.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Efficient genetic value prediction using incomplete omics data.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; Rohan Fernando; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 10.  Improving Genomic Prediction Using High-Dimensional Secondary Phenotypes.

Authors:  Bader Arouisse; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.