Literature DB >> 26883048

Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Johannes W R Martini1, Valentin Wimmer2, Malena Erbe3,4, Henner Simianer3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Models based on additive marker effects and on epistatic interactions can be translated into genomic relationship models. This equivalence allows to perform predictions based on complex gene interaction models and reduces computational effort significantly. In the theory of genome-assisted prediction, the equivalence of a linear model based on independent and identically normally distributed marker effects and a model based on multivariate Gaussian distributed breeding values with genomic relationship as covariance matrix is well known. In this work, we demonstrate equivalences of marker effect models incorporating epistatic interactions and corresponding mixed models based on relationship matrices and show how to exploit these equivalences computationally for genome-assisted prediction. In particular, we show how models with epistatic interactions of higher order (e.g., three-factor interactions) translate into linear models with certain covariance matrices and demonstrate how to construct epistatic relationship matrices for the linear mixed model, if we restrict the model to interactions defined a priori. We illustrate the practical relevance of our results with a publicly available data set on grain yield of wheat lines growing in four different environments. For this purpose, we select important interactions in one environment and use this knowledge on the network of interactions to increase predictive ability of grain yield under other environmental conditions. Our results provide a guide for building relationship matrices based on knowledge on the structure of trait-related gene networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26883048     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2675-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  25 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Modeling quantitative trait Loci and interpretation of models.

Authors:  Zhao-Bang Zeng; Tao Wang; Wei Zou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Allele coding in genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Ismo Strandén; Ole F Christensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Data-driven encoding for quantitative genetic trait prediction.

Authors:  Dan He; Zhanyong Wang; Laxmi Parida
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.

Authors:  William G Hill; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  28 in total

1.  Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.

Authors:  José Crossa; Johannes W R Martini; Daniel Gianola; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Diego Jarquin; Philomin Juliana; Osval Montesinos-López; Jaime Cuevas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Homeologous Epistasis in Wheat: The Search for an Immortal Hybrid.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark Sorrells
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Incorporating Gene Annotation into Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes.

Authors:  Ning Gao; Johannes W R Martini; Zhe Zhang; Xiaolong Yuan; Hao Zhang; Henner Simianer; Jiaqi Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model.

Authors:  Marcel O Berkner; Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Markus Oppermann; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.574

Review 6.  Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.

Authors:  C Anilkumar; N C Sunitha; Narayana Bhat Devate; S Ramesh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Andres Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Efficient genetic value prediction using incomplete omics data.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; Rohan Fernando; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Omics-based hybrid prediction in maize.

Authors:  Matthias Westhues; Tobias A Schrag; Claas Heuer; Georg Thaller; H Friedrich Utz; Wolfgang Schipprack; Alexander Thiemann; Felix Seifert; Anita Ehret; Armin Schlereth; Mark Stitt; Zoran Nikoloski; Lothar Willmitzer; Chris C Schön; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.

Authors:  David González-Diéguez; Andrés Legarra; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau; Christina Lehermeier; Simon Teyssèdre; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.