Literature DB >> 20813882

Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

José Crossa1, Gustavo de Los Campos, Paulino Pérez, Daniel Gianola, Juan Burgueño, José Luis Araus, Dan Makumbi, Ravi P Singh, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jianbing Yan, Vivi Arief, Marianne Banziger, Hans-Joachim Braun.   

Abstract

The availability of dense molecular markers has made possible the use of genomic selection (GS) for plant breeding. However, the evaluation of models for GS in real plant populations is very limited. This article evaluates the performance of parametric and semiparametric models for GS using wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays) data in which different traits were measured in several environmental conditions. The findings, based on extensive cross-validations, indicate that models including marker information had higher predictive ability than pedigree-based models. In the wheat data set, and relative to a pedigree model, gains in predictive ability due to inclusion of markers ranged from 7.7 to 35.7%. Correlation between observed and predictive values in the maize data set achieved values up to 0.79. Estimates of marker effects were different across environmental conditions, indicating that genotype × environment interaction is an important component of genetic variability. These results indicate that GS in plant breeding can be an effective strategy for selecting among lines whose phenotypes have yet to be observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813882      PMCID: PMC2954475          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.118521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Genomewide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations.

Authors:  C K Wong; R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Genomic selection.

Authors:  M E Goddard; B J Hayes
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; C P Van Tassell; G R Wiggans; T S Sonstegard; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  K A Weigel; G de los Campos; O González-Recio; H Naya; X L Wu; N Long; G J M Rosa; D Gianola
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink; Aaron J Lorenz; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Genomic-Enabled Prediction Based on Molecular Markers and Pedigree Using the Bayesian Linear Regression Package in R.

Authors:  Paulino Pérez; Gustavo de Los Campos; José Crossa; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  255 in total

1.  Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Wenxin Liu; Tobias Würschum; Hans P Maurer; Friedrich H Longin; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Friedrich H Longin; Tobias Würschum; Nicolas Ranc; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  Genomic approaches to selection in outcrossing perennials: focus on essential oil crops.

Authors:  David Kainer; Robert Lanfear; William J Foley; Carsten Külheim
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador A Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Valentin Wimmer; Malena Erbe; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Incorporation of parental phenotypic data into multi-omic models improves prediction of yield-related traits in hybrid rice.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Yue Zhao; Xin Wang; Ying Ma; Pengcheng Li; Zefeng Yang; Xuecai Zhang; Chenwu Xu; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.