Literature DB >> 29038144

Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.

Christina Lehermeier1, Simon Teyssèdre2, Chris-Carolin Schön3.   

Abstract

A crucial step in plant breeding is the selection and combination of parents to form new crosses. Genome-based prediction guides the selection of high-performing parental lines in many crop breeding programs which ensures a high mean performance of progeny. To warrant maximum selection progress, a new cross should also provide a large progeny variance. The usefulness concept as measure of the gain that can be obtained from a specific cross accounts for variation in progeny variance. Here, it is shown that genetic gain can be considerably increased when crosses are selected based on their genomic usefulness criterion compared to selection based on mean genomic estimated breeding values. An efficient and improved method to predict the genetic variance of a cross based on Markov chain Monte Carlo samples of marker effects from a whole-genome regression model is suggested. In simulations representing selection procedures in crop breeding programs, the performance of this novel approach is compared with existing methods, like selection based on mean genomic estimated breeding values and optimal haploid values. In all cases, higher genetic gain was obtained compared with previously suggested methods. When 1% of progenies per cross were selected, the genetic gain based on the estimated usefulness criterion increased by 0.14 genetic standard deviation compared to a selection based on mean genomic estimated breeding values. Analytical derivations of the progeny genotypic variance-covariance matrix based on parental genotypes and genetic map information make simulations of progeny dispensable, and allow fast implementation in large-scale breeding programs.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; genomic selection; plant breeding; progeny variance; usefulness criterion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29038144      PMCID: PMC5714471          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  23 in total

1.  Inferring the trajectory of genetic variance in the course of artificial selection.

Authors:  D Sorensen; R Fernando; D Gianola
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Predicted Cross Value for Genetic Introgression of Multiple Alleles.

Authors:  Ye Han; John N Cameron; Lizhi Wang; William D Beavis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Yi Jia; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection.

Authors:  Matthew Goiffon; Aaron Kusmec; Lizhi Wang; Guiping Hu; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection.

Authors:  Valentin Wimmer; Christina Lehermeier; Theresa Albrecht; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Yu Wang; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genomic models with genotype × environment interaction for predicting hybrid performance: an application in maize hybrids.

Authors:  Rocío Acosta-Pech; José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Simon Teyssèdre; Bruno Claustres; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Mendelian sampling covariability of marker effects and genetic values.

Authors:  Sarah Bonk; Manuela Reichelt; Friedrich Teuscher; Dierck Segelke; Norbert Reinsch
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Covariance Between Genotypic Effects and its Use for Genomic Inference in Half-Sib Families.

Authors:  Dörte Wittenburg; Friedrich Teuscher; Jan Klosa; Norbert Reinsch
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Incorporating Genetic Heterogeneity in Whole-Genome Regressions Using Interactions.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Yogasudha Veturi; Ana I Vazquez; Christina Lehermeier; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 1.524

View more
  15 in total

1.  Breeding Top Genotypes and Accelerating Response to Recurrent Selection by Selecting Parents with Greater Gametic Variance.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction with a maize collaborative panel: identification of genetic resources to enrich elite breeding programs.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; William Beavis; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Asheesh K Singh; Julio Isidro-Sánchez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Exploring and exploiting the genetic variation of Fusarium head blight resistance for genomic-assisted breeding in the elite durum wheat gene pool.

Authors:  Barbara Steiner; Sebastian Michel; Marco Maccaferri; Marc Lemmens; Roberto Tuberosa; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Usefulness Criterion and Post-selection Parental Contributions in Multi-parental Crosses: Application to Polygenic Trait Introgression.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Multi-trait Improvement by Predicting Genetic Correlations in Breeding Crosses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Neyhart; Aaron J Lorenz; Kevin P Smith
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Improving Short- and Long-Term Genetic Gain by Accounting for Within-Family Variance in Optimal Cross-Selection.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau; Simon Teyssèdre
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Preservation of Genetic Variation in a Breeding Population for Long-Term Genetic Gain.

Authors:  David Vanavermaete; Jan Fostier; Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 9.  Understanding the classics: the unifying concepts of transgressive segregation, inbreeding depression and heterosis and their central relevance for crop breeding.

Authors:  Ian J Mackay; James Cockram; Phil Howell; Wayne Powell
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Why and How to Switch to Genomic Selection: Lessons From Plant and Animal Breeding Experience.

Authors:  Aline Fugeray-Scarbel; Catherine Bastien; Mathilde Dupont-Nivet; Stéphane Lemarié
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.