Literature DB >> 26747048

Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Sang He1, Albert Wilhelm Schulthess1, Vilson Mirdita1, Yusheng Zhao1, Viktor Korzun2, Reiner Bothe2, Erhard Ebmeyer2, Jochen C Reif3, Yong Jiang1.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Genomic selection models can be trained using historical data and filtering genotypes based on phenotyping intensity and reliability criterion are able to increase the prediction ability. We implemented genomic selection based on a large commercial population incorporating 2325 European winter wheat lines. Our objectives were (1) to study whether modeling epistasis besides additive genetic effects results in enhancement on prediction ability of genomic selection, (2) to assess prediction ability when training population comprised historical or less-intensively phenotyped lines, and (3) to explore the prediction ability in subpopulations selected based on the reliability criterion. We found a 5 % increase in prediction ability when shifting from additive to additive plus epistatic effects models. In addition, only a marginal loss from 0.65 to 0.50 in accuracy was observed using the data collected from 1 year to predict genotypes of the following year, revealing that stable genomic selection models can be accurately calibrated to predict subsequent breeding stages. Moreover, prediction ability was maximized when the genotypes evaluated in a single location were excluded from the training set but subsequently decreased again when the phenotyping intensity was increased above two locations, suggesting that the update of the training population should be performed considering all the selected genotypes but excluding those evaluated in a single location. The genomic prediction ability was substantially higher in subpopulations selected based on the reliability criterion, indicating that phenotypic selection for highly reliable individuals could be directly replaced by applying genomic selection to them. We empirically conclude that there is a high potential to assist commercial wheat breeding programs employing genomic selection approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26747048     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2655-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  44 in total

1.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection.

Authors:  Torben Schulz-Streeck; Joseph O Ogutu; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  The impact of population structure on genomic prediction in stratified populations.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Dominic M Tucker; Christopher J Basten; Harish Gandhi; Elhan Ersoz; Baohong Guo; Zhanyou Xu; Daolong Wang; Gilles Gay
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.

Authors:  J A Jiménez-Montero; O González-Recio; R Alenda
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Zengting Liu; Franz R Seefried; Friedrich Reinhardt; Stephan Rensing; Georg Thaller; Reinhard Reents
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection.

Authors:  Julio Isidro; Jean-Luc Jannink; Deniz Akdemir; Jesse Poland; Nicolas Heslot; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  47 in total

1.  Unlocking historical phenotypic data from an ex situ collection to enhance the informed utilization of genetic resources of barley (Hordeum sp.).

Authors:  Maria Y González; Norman Philipp; Albert W Schulthess; Stephan Weise; Yusheng Zhao; Andreas Börner; Markus Oppermann; Andreas Graner; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Optimum breeding strategies using genomic selection for hybrid breeding in wheat, maize, rye, barley, rice and triticale.

Authors:  Jose J Marulanda; Xuefei Mi; Albrecht E Melchinger; Jian-Long Xu; T Würschum; C Friedrich H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genomic selection for wheat traits and trait stability.

Authors:  Mao Huang; Antonio Cabrera; Amber Hoffstetter; Carl Griffey; David Van Sanford; José Costa; Anne McKendry; Shiaoman Chao; Clay Sneller
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Extension of a haplotype-based genomic prediction model to manage multi-environment wheat data using environmental covariates.

Authors:  Sang He; Rebecca Thistlethwaite; Kerrie Forrest; Fan Shi; Matthew J Hayden; Richard Trethowan; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Evaluation of the genetic architecture and the potential of genomics-assisted breeding of quality traits in two large panels of durum wheat.

Authors:  M Rapp; A Sieber; Ebrahim Kazman; Willmar L Leiser; T Würschum; C F H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Maximilian Rembe; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Validating the prediction accuracies of marker-assisted and genomic selection of Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat using an independent sample.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Bernd Rodemann; Jie Ling; Jörg Plieske; Sonja Kollers; Erhard Ebmeyer; Viktor Korzun; Odile Argillier; Gunther Stiewe; Martin W Ganal; Marion S Röder; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Genome-wide mapping and prediction suggests presence of local epistasis in a vast elite winter wheat populations adapted to Central Europe.

Authors:  Sang He; Jochen C Reif; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and protein content in durum wheat by different phenotypic indices and genomic selection.

Authors:  M Rapp; V Lein; F Lacoudre; J Lafferty; E Müller; G Vida; V Bozhanova; A Ibraliu; P Thorwarth; H P Piepho; W L Leiser; T Würschum; C F H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Advantages and limitations of multiple-trait genomic prediction for Fusarium head blight severity in hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.