Literature DB >> 18946147

Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

P M VanRaden1.   

Abstract

Efficient methods for processing genomic data were developed to increase reliability of estimated breeding values and to estimate thousands of marker effects simultaneously. Algorithms were derived and computer programs tested with simulated data for 2,967 bulls and 50,000 markers distributed randomly across 30 chromosomes. Estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients required accurate estimates of allele frequencies in the base population. Linear model predictions of breeding values were computed by 3 equivalent methods: 1) iteration for individual allele effects followed by summation across loci to obtain estimated breeding values, 2) selection index including a genomic relationship matrix, and 3) mixed model equations including the inverse of genomic relationships. A blend of first- and second-order Jacobi iteration using 2 separate relaxation factors converged well for allele frequencies and effects. Reliability of predicted net merit for young bulls was 63% compared with 32% using the traditional relationship matrix. Nonlinear predictions were also computed using iteration on data and nonlinear regression on marker deviations; an additional (about 3%) gain in reliability for young bulls increased average reliability to 66%. Computing times increased linearly with number of genotypes. Estimation of allele frequencies required 2 processor days, and genomic predictions required <1 d per trait, and traits were processed in parallel. Information from genotyping was equivalent to about 20 daughters with phenotypic records. Actual gains may differ because the simulation did not account for linkage disequilibrium in the base population or selection in subsequent generations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946147     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  1447 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  A non-parametric mixture model for genome-enabled prediction of genetic value for a quantitative trait.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Xiao-Lin Wu; Eduardo Manfredi; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Jian Yang; S Hong Lee; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.

Authors:  Fernanda S S Raidan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Yutao Li; Sigrid A Lehnert; Zulma G Vitezica; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic analysis of disease resilience in wean-to-finish pigs from a natural disease challenge model.

Authors:  Jian Cheng; Austin M Putz; John C S Harding; Michael K Dyck; Frederic Fortin; Graham S Plastow; PigGen Canada; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  M K Abo-Ismail; N Lansink; E Akanno; B K Karisa; J J Crowley; S S Moore; E Bork; P Stothard; J A Basarab; G S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Carly I O O’Malley; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Simon P Turner; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.