Literature DB >> 2590278

Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization.

A Moiseff1.   

Abstract

1. Bilateral recording of cochlear potentials was used to measure the variations in interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural intensity differences (IIDs) as a free-field auditory stimulus was moved to different positions around a barn owl's head. 2. ITD varied smoothly with stimulus azimuth across a broad frequency range. 3. ITD varied minimally with stimulus elevation, except at extreme angles from the horizontal. 4. IID varied with both stimulus elevation and stimulus azimuth. Lower frequencies were more sensitive to variations in azimuth, whereas higher frequencies were more sensitive to variations in elevation. 5. The loci of spatial coordinates that form iso-IID contours and iso-ITD contours form a non-orthogonal grid that relates binaural disparity cues to sound location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2590278     DOI: 10.1007/bf00614505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  12 in total

1.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain.

Authors:  T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Interaural intensity differences in the cat: changes in sound pressure level at the two ears associated with azimuthal displacements in the frontal horizontal plane.

Authors:  D R Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Frequency dependence of directional amplification at the cat's pinna.

Authors:  M B Calford; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  33 in total

1.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David R Euston; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors:  B J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The effects of experimentally induced conductive hearing loss on spectral and temporal aspects of sound transmission through the ear.

Authors:  J Eric Lupo; Kanthaiah Koka; Jennifer L Thornton; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Sound pressure transformations by the head and pinnae of the adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera).

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; Heath G Jones; Jennifer L Thornton; J Eric Lupo; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Neural mechanisms of directional hearing in the pigeon.

Authors:  J Lewald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Sound localization cues in the marmoset monkey.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.