Literature DB >> 3385664

Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

R B Coles1, A Guppy.   

Abstract

The acoustical properties of the external ear of the barn owl (Tyto alba) were studied by measuring sound pressure in the ear canal and outer ear cavity. Under normal conditions, pressure amplification by the external ear reaches about 20 dB between 3-9 kHz but decreases sharply above 10 kHz. The acoustic gain curve of the outer ear cavity alone is close to that of a finite-length exponential horn between 1.2-13 kHz with maximum gain reaching 20 dB between 5-9 kHz. Pressure gain by the facial ruff produces a maximum of 12 dB between 5-8 kHz and decreases rapidly above 9 kHz. The directional sensitivity of the external ear was obtained from pressure measurements in the ear canal. Directivity of the major lobe is explained, to a first approximation, by the sound diffraction properties of a circular aperture. Aperture size is based on the average radius (30 mm) of the open face of the ruff. Above 5 kHz, the external ear becomes highly directional and there is a 26 degree disparity in elevation between the acoustic axis of the left and right ear. In azimuth, directivity patterns are relocated closer to the midline as frequency increases and the acoustic axis moves at a rate of 20 degree/octave between 2-13 kHz. Movement of the axis can be explained, to a first approximation, by the acoustical diffraction properties of an obliquely truncated horn, due to the asymmetrical shape of the outer ear cavity. The directional sensitivity of the barn owl ear was studied by recording cochlear microphonic (CM) potentials from the round window membrane. Between 3-9 kHz, CM directivity patterns are clearly different to the directivity patterns of the external ear; CM directionality is abruptly lost above 10 kHz. Above 5 kHz, CM directivity patterns are characterized by an elongated major lobe containing the CM axis, forming a tilted band of high amplitude but low directionality (CM axial plane), closely bordered by minima or nulls. The highest directionality is found in the CM directional plane, approximately perpendicular to the CM axial plane. The left and right ear axial planes are symmetrical about the interaural midline (tilted 12 degrees to the right of the midline of the head) and inclined by an average of 60 degrees to the left and right respectively. In azimuth, the CM axis moves towards the midline at a rate of 37 degrees/octave as frequency increases from 2-9 kHz, crossing into contralateral space near 7 kHz.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3385664     DOI: 10.1007/bf00612002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  12 in total

1.  Receptive fields of auditory neurons in the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M Konishi; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Dynamics of the amphibian middle ear.

Authors:  S H Chung; A Pettigrew; M Anson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Neurophysiological basis of directional hearing in amphibia.

Authors:  A Pettigrew; S H Chung; M Anson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A neural map of auditory space in the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M Konishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Functional classes of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat distinguished by sensitivity to sound location.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Monaural occlusion shifts receptive-field locations of auditory midbrain units in the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Directionality of sound pressure transformation at the cat's pinna.

Authors:  D P Phillips; M B Calford; J D Pettigrew; L M Aitkin; M N Semple
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Physical models for the analysis of acoustical systems in biology.

Authors:  N H Fletcher; S Thwaites
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  22 in total

1.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors:  B J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Creating a sense of auditory space.

Authors:  David McAlpine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Direction selectivity mediated by adaptation in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Directional hearing by mechanical coupling in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  D Robert; R N Miles; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Azimuthal sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Physical binaural cues.

Authors:  G M Klump; O N Larsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.