Literature DB >> 3794779

Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain.

T Takahashi, M Konishi.   

Abstract

The barn owl uses the interaural difference in the timing of sounds to determine the azimuth of the source. When the sound has a wide frequency band, localization is precise. When localizing tones, however, the barn owl errs in a manner that suggests that it is confused by phantom targets. We report a neural equivalent of these phenomena as they are observed in the space-specific neuron of the owl's inferior colliculus. When stimulated with a tone, the space-specific neuron discharges maximally at interaural time differences (ITDs) that differ by one period of the stimulus tone. Changing the stimulus frequency changes the period of the ITD-response functions, but 1 ITD evokes, in most neurons, a maximal response, regardless of frequency. This ITD is the characteristic delay (CD). When stimulated with noise, there is a maximal response only to ITDs at or near the CD. Thus, the space-specific neuron can unambiguously signal the CD, provided that the signal contains more than 1 frequency. The preferential response to a single ITD, which is observed with noise stimuli, was also observed when the summed waveform of the best frequency and another tone, F2, was presented. The response of the space-specific neuron to these 2-tone stimuli could not be accounted for by the summing or averaging of the ITD-response functions obtained with the best frequency or F2 alone, suggesting that nonlinear neural processes are involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3794779      PMCID: PMC6568656     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  A site of auditory experience-dependent plasticity in the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Abnormal auditory experience induces frequency-specific adjustments in unit tuning for binaural localization cues in the optic tectum of juvenile owls.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; W Zheng; W M DeBello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David R Euston; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors:  B J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neurons in the midbrain of the barn owl are sensitive to the direction of apparent acoustic motion.

Authors:  H Wagner; T Takahashi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-09

9.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.