Literature DB >> 10531469

Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

C Köppl1, G Yates.   

Abstract

Rate-intensity functions, i.e., the relation between discharge rate and sound pressure level, were recorded from single auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl. Differences in sound pressure level between the owl's two ears are known to be an important cue in sound localization. One objective was therefore to quantify the discharge rates of auditory nerve fibers, as a basis for higher-order processing of sound pressure level. The second aim was to investigate the rate-intensity functions for cues to the underlying cochlear mechanisms, using a model developed in mammals. Rate-intensity functions at the most sensitive frequency mostly showed a well-defined breakpoint between an initial steep segment and a progressively flattening segment. This shape has, in mammals, been convincingly traced to a compressive nonlinearity in the cochlear mechanics, which in turn is a reflection of the cochlear amplifier enhancing low-level stimuli. The similarity of the rate-intensity functions of the barn owl is thus further evidence for a similar mechanism in birds. An interesting difference from mammalian data was that this compressive nonlinearity was not shared among fibers of similar characteristic frequency, suggesting a different mechanism with a more locally differentiated operation than in mammals. In all fibers, the steepest change in discharge rate with rising sound pressure level occurred within 10-20 dB of their respective thresholds. Because the range of neural thresholds at any one characteristic frequency is small in the owl, auditory nerve fibers were collectively most sensitive for changes in sound pressure level within approximately 30 dB of the best thresholds. Fibers most sensitive to high frequencies (>6-7 kHz) showed a smaller increase of rate above spontaneous discharge rate than did lower-frequency fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10531469      PMCID: PMC6782939     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Stretched and upside-down maps of auditory space in the optic tectum of blind-reared owls; acoustic basis and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; S D Esterly; S du Lac
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Shapes of rate-versus-level functions of primary auditory nerve fibres: test of the basilar membrane mechanical hypothesis.

Authors:  M Müller; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  How well do we understand the cochlea?

Authors:  R Nobili; F Mammano; J Ashmore
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Excitation and suppression of primary auditory fibres in the pigeon.

Authors:  K G Hill; J Mo; G Stange
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Unusual discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon's auditory nerve.

Authors:  A N Temchin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M E Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba.

Authors:  C Köppl
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres.

Authors:  I M Winter; D Robertson; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage.

Authors:  D A Cotanche; K H Lee; J S Stone; D A Picard
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1994-01
View more
  16 in total

1.  Hair bundle profiles along the chick basilar papilla.

Authors:  R K Duncan; K E Ile; M G Dubin; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P Heil; H Neubauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Computational diversity in the cochlear nucleus angularis of the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial tuning curves along the chick basilar papilla in normal and sound-exposed ears.

Authors:  J Lifshitz; A C Furman; K W Altman; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06

6.  Effect of instantaneous frequency glides on interaural time difference processing by auditory coincidence detectors.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Louisa J Steinberg; Bertrand Fontaine; Romain Brette; Jose L Peña
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Multidimensional stimulus encoding in the auditory nerve of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Jacob L Wydick; Christine Köppl; José L Peña
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.