Literature DB >> 25808122

Objective and subjective image quality of primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma on head and neck low-tube-voltage 80-kVp computed tomography.

Jan-Erik Scholtz1, Moritz Kaup, Johannes Kraft, Eva-Maria Nöske, Friedrich Scheerer, Boris Schulz, Iris Burck, Jens Wagenblast, J Matthias Kerl, Ralf W Bauer, Thomas Lehnert, Thomas J Vogl, Julian L Wichmann.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To investigate low-tube-voltage 80-kVp computed tomography (CT) of head and neck primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) regarding objective and subjective image quality.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 65 patients (47 male, 18 female; mean age: 62.1 years) who underwent head and neck dual-energy CT (DECT) due to biopsy-proven primary (n = 50) or recurrent (n = 15) SCC. Eighty peak kilovoltage and standard blended 120-kVp images were compared. Attenuation and noise of malignancy and various soft tissue structures were measured. Tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective image quality was rated by three reviewers using 5-point grading scales regarding overall image quality, lesion delineation, image sharpness, and image noise. Radiation dose was assessed as CT dose index volume (CTDIvol). Interobserver agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Mean tumor attenuation (153.8 Hounsfield unit (HU) vs. 97.1 HU), SNR (10.7 vs. 8.3), CNR (8.1 vs. 4.8), and subjective tumor delineation (score, 4.46 vs. 4.13) were significantly increased (all P < 0.001) with 80-kVp acquisition compared to standard blended 120-kVp images. Noise of all measured structures was increased in 80-kVp acquisition (P < 0.001). Overall interobserver agreement was good (ICC, 0.86; 95 % confidence intervals: 0.82-0.89). CTDIvol was reduced by 48.7 % with 80-kVp acquisition compared to standard DECT (4.85 ± 0.51 vs. 9.94 ± 0.81 mGy cm, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck CT with low-tube-voltage 80-kVp acquisition provides increased tumor delineation, SNR, and CNR for CT imaging of primary and recurrent SCC compared to standard 120-kVp acquisition with an accompanying significant reduction of radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808122     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-015-1512-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  25 in total

1.  Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values.

Authors:  Michael Toepker; Thomas Moritz; Bernhard Krauss; Michael Weber; Gordon Euller; Thomas Mang; Florian Wolf; Christian J Herold; Helmut Ringl
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol.

Authors:  R Gnannt; A Winklehner; R Goetti; B Schmidt; S Kollias; H Alkadhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Variation in tube voltage for adult neck MDCT: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Jenny K Hoang; Terry T Yoshizumi; Giao Nguyen; Greta Toncheva; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Andreia R Gafton; James D Eastwood; Carolyn Lowry; Lynne M Hurwitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings.

Authors:  Takeshi Nakaura; Kazuo Awai; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Kazunori Harada; Shouzaburou Uemura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation.

Authors:  Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Dierks; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Thorsten R C Johnson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Non-linear image blending improves visualization of head and neck primary squamous cell carcinoma compared to linear blending in dual-energy CT.

Authors:  J-E Scholtz; K Hüsers; M Kaup; M Albrecht; B Schulz; C Frellesen; B Bodelle; J Wagenblast; J M Kerl; R W Bauer; T Lehnert; T J Vogl; J L Wichmann
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Comparison of dual-energy CT-derived iodine content and iodine overlay of normal, inflammatory and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ahmed M Tawfik; A A Razek; J Matthias Kerl; N E Nour-Eldin; Ralf Bauer; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Wei-lan Zhang; Min Li; Bo Zhang; Hai-yang Geng; Yin-qiang Liang; Ke Xu; Song-bai Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Maliha Sadick; Stefan O Schoenberg; Karl Hoermann; Haneen Sadick
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20
View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of virtual monoenergetic and polyenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer detector CT angiography of the head and neck.

Authors:  Victor Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Nuran Abdullayev; Volker Maus; Christoph Kabbasch; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic yield of 90-kVp low-tube-voltage carotid and intracerebral CT-angiography: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance for the detection of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Doris Leithner; Julian L Wichmann; Scherwin Mahmoudi; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Thomas J Vogl; Jan-Erik Scholtz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Tube-Voltage Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT: Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Image Quality.

Authors:  J-E Scholtz; M Kaup; K Hüsers; M H Albrecht; B Bodelle; S C Metzger; J M Kerl; R W Bauer; T Lehnert; T J Vogl; J L Wichmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Comparison of MR Imaging and Dual-Energy CT for the Evaluation of Cartilage Invasion by Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  H Kuno; K Sakamaki; S Fujii; K Sekiya; K Otani; R Hayashi; T Yamanaka; O Sakai; M Kusumoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Third-generation dual-source CT of the neck using automated tube voltage adaptation in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Scholtz; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Moritz H Albrecht; Martin Beeres; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas J Vogl; Boris Bodelle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of dual- and single-source dual-energy CT in head and neck imaging.

Authors:  Matthias Stefan May; Marco Wiesmueller; Rafael Heiss; Michael Brand; Joscha Bruegel; Michael Uder; Wolfgang Wuest
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison of tumor delineation using dual energy computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer re-irradiation cases.

Authors:  Sweet Ping Ng; Carlos E Cardenas; Hesham Elhalawani; Courtney Pollard; Baher Elgohari; Penny Fang; Mohamed Meheissen; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Houda Bahig; Jason M Johnson; Mona Kamal; Adam S Garden; Jay P Reddy; Shirley Y Su; Renata Ferrarotto; Steven J Frank; G Brandon Gunn; Amy C Moreno; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Jack Phan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29

8.  Change in Image Quality According to the 3D Locations of a CBCT Phantom.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Hyok Park; Ho-Gul Jeong; Sang-Sun Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Dual-Energy CT in Head and Neck Imaging.

Authors:  Elise D Roele; Veronique C M L Timmer; Lauretta A A Vaassen; Anna M J L van Kroonenburgh; A A Postma
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2017-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.