OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of low-tube-voltage 90-kVp acquisition combined with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (Admire) on radiation exposure, image quality, artifacts, and assessment of stenosis in carotid and intracranial CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: Dual-energy CTA studies of 43 patients performed on a third-generation 192-slice dual-source CT were retrospectively evaluated. Intraindividual comparison of 90-kVp and linearly blended 120-kVp equivalent image series (M_0.6, 60% 90-kVp, 40% Sn-150-kVp) was performed. Contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios of common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and basilar artery were calculated. Qualitative image analysis included evaluation of artifacts and suitability for angiographical assessment at shoulder level, carotid bifurcation, siphon, and intracranial by three independent radiologists. Detection and quantification of carotid stenosis were performed. Radiation dose was expressed as dose-length product (DLP). RESULTS: Contrast-to-noise values of all arteries were significantly increased in 90-kVp compared to M_0.6 (p < 0.001). Suitability for angiographical evaluation was rated excellent with low artifacts for all levels in both image series. Both 90-kVp and M_0.6 showed excellent accordance for detection and grading of carotid stenosis with almost perfect interobserver agreement (carotid stenoses in 32 of 129 segments; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94). dose-length product was reduced by 40.3% in 90-kVp (110.6 ± 32.1 vs 185.4 ± 47.5 mGy·cm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with Admire provides increased quantitative and similarly good qualitative image quality, while reducing radiation exposure substantially compared to M_0.6. Diagnostic performance for arterial stenosis detection and quantification remained excellent. Advances in knowledge: 90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with an advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm results in excellent image quality and reduction of radiation exposure without limiting diagnostic performance.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of low-tube-voltage 90-kVp acquisition combined with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (Admire) on radiation exposure, image quality, artifacts, and assessment of stenosis in carotid and intracranial CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: Dual-energy CTA studies of 43 patients performed on a third-generation 192-slice dual-source CT were retrospectively evaluated. Intraindividual comparison of 90-kVp and linearly blended 120-kVp equivalent image series (M_0.6, 60% 90-kVp, 40% Sn-150-kVp) was performed. Contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios of common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and basilar artery were calculated. Qualitative image analysis included evaluation of artifacts and suitability for angiographical assessment at shoulder level, carotid bifurcation, siphon, and intracranial by three independent radiologists. Detection and quantification of carotid stenosis were performed. Radiation dose was expressed as dose-length product (DLP). RESULTS: Contrast-to-noise values of all arteries were significantly increased in 90-kVp compared to M_0.6 (p < 0.001). Suitability for angiographical evaluation was rated excellent with low artifacts for all levels in both image series. Both 90-kVp and M_0.6 showed excellent accordance for detection and grading of carotid stenosis with almost perfect interobserver agreement (carotid stenoses in 32 of 129 segments; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94). dose-length product was reduced by 40.3% in 90-kVp (110.6 ± 32.1 vs 185.4 ± 47.5 mGy·cm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with Admire provides increased quantitative and similarly good qualitative image quality, while reducing radiation exposure substantially compared to M_0.6. Diagnostic performance for arterial stenosis detection and quantification remained excellent. Advances in knowledge: 90-kVp carotid and intracranial CTA with an advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm results in excellent image quality and reduction of radiation exposure without limiting diagnostic performance.
Authors: Oliver Rompel; Martin Glöckler; Rolf Janka; Sven Dittrich; Robert Cesnjevar; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Matthias Hammon Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-01-06
Authors: Sonja Gordic; Lotus Desbiolles; Martin Sedlmair; Robert Manka; André Plass; Bernhard Schmidt; Daniela B Husarik; Francesco Maisano; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jan-Erik Scholtz; Moritz Kaup; Johannes Kraft; Eva-Maria Nöske; Friedrich Scheerer; Boris Schulz; Iris Burck; Jens Wagenblast; J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: M Kayan; H Demirtas; Y Türker; F Kayan; G Çetinkaya; M Kara; A Orhan Çelik; A Umul; Ö Yılmaz; A Recep Aktaş Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Marvin Lange; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Christian Booz; Ibrahim Yel; Christophe T Arendt; Thomas J Vogl; Doris Leithner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Girish Bathla; Lama Abdel-Wahed; Amit Agarwal; Tracey A Cho; Sarika Gupta; Karra A Jones; Sarv Priya; Neetu Soni; Bruce A Wasserman Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2021-08-04