Literature DB >> 25478447

A comparative evaluation of the dimensional stability of three different elastomeric impression materials after autoclaving - an invitro study.

Kiran Kumar Thota1, Sujana Jasthi2, Rajyalakshmi Ravuri1, Suchita Tella3.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of autoclaving on the dimensional stability of three different elastomeric impression materials at three different time intervals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized stainless steel master die as per ADA specification number 19 was fabricated. The impression materials used for the study were condensation silicone (GP1), addition silicone (GP2) and polyether (GP3). A total of 45 samples of the stainless steel die were made (n = 45), that is 15 samples for each group. Impression materials were mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and were loaded into the mold to make an impression of the die. Impressions were identified with the help of numerical coding system and measurements were made using stereomicroscope (MAGNUS MSZ-Bi) of 0.65x magnification with the help of image analysis software (IMACE PRO-INSIGHT VERSION.The results were subjected to statistical analysis using one way analysis of variance and student t-test for comparison between the groups.
RESULTS: Within the limitations of the study statistically significant dimensional changes were observed for all the three impression materials at three different time intervals but this change was not clinically significant.
CONCLUSION: It is well-known fact that all impressions should be disinfected to avoid possible transmission of infectious diseases either by direct contact or cross contamination. Immersion and spray disinfection as well as various disinfection solutions have been tested and proven to be effective for this purpose. But for elastomeric impression materials these methods have proven to be ineffective as they do not prevent cross contamination among the dental team. So autoclaving was one of the most effective sterilization procedure for condensation silicone and addition silicone. Since polyether is hydrophilic it is better to disinfect the impressions as recommended by the manufacturer or by immersion or spray atomization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dimensional accuracy; Elastomeric impression materials; Infection control; Storage time

Year:  2014        PMID: 25478447      PMCID: PMC4253265          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9768.5036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  11 in total

1.  Effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  G L Adabo; E Zanarotti; R G Fonseca; C A Cruz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Evaluation of dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals: an in vitro study.

Authors:  G Anup; S C Ahila; M Vasanthakumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-03-06

3.  Evaluation of dimensional stability of autoclavable elastomeric impression material.

Authors:  G P Surendra; Ayesha Anjum; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-04-19

4.  Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants.

Authors:  A Thouati; E Deveaux; A Iost; P Behin
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex.

Authors:  M P Rios; S M Morgano; R S Stein; L Rose
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area.

Authors:  Shifra Levartovsky; Guy Levy; Tamar Brosh; Noga Harel; Yehuda Ganor; Raphael Pilo
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Accuracy of polyether and addition silicone after long-term immersion disinfection.

Authors:  X Lepe; G H Johnson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.

Authors:  G H Johnson; K D Chellis; G E Gordon; X Lepe
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.

Authors:  Mary P Walker; Meagan Rondeau; Cynthia Petrie; Amy Tasca; Karen Williams
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Effect of immersion disinfection on properties of impression materials.

Authors:  B A Davis; J M Powers
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Elastomeric Impression Materials when Treated with Autoclave, Microwave, and Chemical Disinfection.

Authors:  Suresh S Kamble; Rakshit Vijay Khandeparker; P Somasundaram; Shweta Raghav; Rashmi P Babaji; T Joju Varghese
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Sahar AlZain
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-12-23

3.  Dimensional stability of two impression materials after a 6-month storage period.

Authors:  Francisco Martins; Patrícia Branco; José Reis; Ignacio Barbero Navarro; Paulo Maurício
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-11-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.