Literature DB >> 25306506

Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour2, Chandan H Suresh3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate how nonspeech pitch contours of varying shape influence latency and amplitude of cortical pitch-specific response (CPR) components differentially as a function of language experience. Stimuli included time-varying, high rising Mandarin Tone 2 (T2) and linear rising ramp (Linear), and steady-state (Flat). Both the latency and magnitude of CPR components were differentially modulated by (i) the overall trajectory of pitch contours (time-varying vs. steady-state), (ii) their pitch acceleration rates (changing vs. constant), and (iii) their linguistic status (lexical vs. non-lexical). T2 elicited larger amplitude than Linear in both language groups, but size of the effect was larger in Chinese than English. The magnitude of CPR components elicited by T2 were larger for Chinese than English at the right temporal electrode site. Using the CPR, we provide evidence in support of experience-dependent modulation of dynamic pitch contours at an early stage of sensory processing.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical pitch response; Experience-dependent plasticity; Functional asymmetry; Iterated rippled noise; Lexical tone; Mandarin Chinese; Pitch; Pitch acceleration; Tone language

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25306506      PMCID: PMC4335674          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  53 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Roy D Patterson; Michael Scherg; Stefan Uppenkamp; André Rupp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Cerebral processing of linguistic and emotional prosody: fMRI studies.

Authors:  D Wildgruber; H Ackermann; B Kreifelts; T Ethofer
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution.

Authors:  Krista L Hyde; Isabelle Peretz; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; S Kruck; W De Baene; E Schröger; K Alter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Roy Patterson; Katrin Krumbholz; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  11 in total

1.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Pitch processing of dynamic lexical tones in the auditory cortex is influenced by sensory and extrasensory processes.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Experience-dependent enhancement of pitch-specific responses in the auditory cortex is limited to acceleration rates in normal voice range.

Authors:  A Krishnan; J T Gandour; C H Suresh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.

Authors:  Emily X Han; Joseph M Fernandez; Caitlin Swanberg; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Neural Correlates of Indicators of Sound Change in Cantonese: Evidence from Cortical and Subcortical Processes.

Authors:  Akshay R Maggu; Fang Liu; Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.