Literature DB >> 16464550

Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.

Annemarie Seither-Preisler1, Roy Patterson, Katrin Krumbholz, Stefan Seither, Bernd Lütkenhöner.   

Abstract

The latency of the N100m component of the auditory evoked field (AEF) is sensitive to the period and spectrum of a sound. However, little attention was paid so far to the wave shape at stimulus onset, which might have biased previous results. This problem was fixed in the present study by aligning the first major peaks in the acoustic waveforms. The stimuli were harmonic tones (spectral range: 800-5000 Hz) with periods corresponding to 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz. The frequency components were in sine, alternating or random phase. Simulations with a computational model suggest that the auditory-nerve activity is strongly affected by both the period and the relative phase of the stimulus, whereas the output of the more central pitch processor only depends on the period. Our AEF data, recorded from the right hemisphere of seven subjects, are consistent with the latter prediction: The latency of the N100m depends on the period, but not on the relative phase of the stimulus components. This suggests that the N100m reflects temporal pitch extraction, not necessarily implying that the underlying generators are directly involved in this analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16464550     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; V Gumenyuk; J Grushko; K Lawson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  ERP evidence for the recognition of emotional prosody through simulated cochlear implant strategies.

Authors:  Deepashri Agrawal; Lydia Timm; Filipa Campos Viola; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Electrophysiological responses to emotional prosody perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  D Agrawal; J D Thorne; F C Viola; L Timm; S Debener; A Büchner; R Dengler; M Wittfoth
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Linda Johnson; Katrin Krumbholz; Andrea Nobbe; Roy Patterson; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Insights on the Neuromagnetic Representation of Temporal Asymmetry in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Alejandro Tabas; Anita Siebert; Selma Supek; Daniel Pressnitzer; Emili Balaguer-Ballester; André Rupp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.