Literature DB >> 30921642

Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Chandan H Suresh2, Jackson T Gandour3.   

Abstract

Long-term language and music experience enhances neural representation of temporal attributes of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex in favorable listening conditions. Herein we examine whether brainstem and cortical pitch mechanisms-shaped by long-term language experience-maintain this advantage in the presence of reverberation-induced degradation in pitch representation. Brainstem frequency following responses (FFR) and cortical pitch responses (CPR) were recorded concurrently from Chinese and English-speaking natives, using a Mandarin word exhibiting a high rising pitch (/yi2/). Stimuli were presented diotically in quiet (Dry), and in the presence of Slight, Mild, and Moderate reverberation conditions. Regardless of language group, the amplitude of both brainstem FFR (F0) and cortical CPR (NaPb) responses decreased with increases in reverberation. Response amplitude for Chinese, however, was larger than English in all reverberant conditions. The Chinese group also exhibited a robust rightward asymmetry at temporal electrode sites (T8 > T7) across stimulus conditions. Regardless of language group, direct comparison of brainstem and cortical responses revealed similar magnitude of change in response amplitude with increasing reverberation. These findings suggest that experience-dependent brainstem and cortical pitch mechanisms provide an enhanced and stable neural representation of pitch-relevant information that is maintained even in the presence of reverberation. Relatively greater degradative effects of reverberation on brainstem (FFR) compared to cortical (NaPb) responses suggest relatively stronger top-down influences on CPRs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical pitch response (CPR); Frequency following response (FFR); Pitch encoding; Reverberation; Spectrotemporal degradation; Top-down mechanisms

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921642      PMCID: PMC6543830          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  58 in total

1.  Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians.

Authors:  C Pantev; L E Roberts; M Schulz; A Engelien; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Roy D Patterson; André Rupp; Stefan Uppenkamp; Michael Scherg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech.

Authors:  Robert J. Zatorre; Pascal Belin; Virginia B. Penhune
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Roy D Patterson; Michael Scherg; Stefan Uppenkamp; André Rupp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Reverberation challenges the temporal representation of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  On the relationship between degree of hand-preference and degree of language lateralization.

Authors:  Metten Somers; Maartje F Aukes; Roel A Ophoff; Marco P Boks; Willemien Fleer; Kees C L de Visser; René S Kahn; Iris E Sommer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 9.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Athleticism and sex impact neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Silvia Bonacina; Danielle Colegrove; Rembrandt Otto-Meyer; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.