Literature DB >> 28108254

Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Chandan H Suresh2, Jackson T Gandour3.   

Abstract

Language experience shapes encoding of pitch-relevant information at both brainstem and cortical levels of processing. Pitch height is a salient dimension that orders pitch from low to high. Herein we investigate the effects of language experience (Chinese, English) in the brainstem and cortex on (i) neural responses to variations in pitch height, (ii) presence of asymmetry in cortical pitch representation, and (iii) patterns of relative changes in magnitude of pitch height between these two levels of brain structure. Stimuli were three nonspeech homologs of Mandarin Tone 2 varying in pitch height only. The frequency-following response (FFR) and the cortical pitch-specific response (CPR) were recorded concurrently. At the Fz-linked T7/T8 site, peak latency of Na, Pb, and Nb decreased with increasing pitch height for both groups. Peak-to-peak amplitude of Na-Pb and Pb-Nb increased with increasing pitch height across groups. A language-dependent effect was restricted to Na-Pb; the Chinese had larger amplitude than the English group. At temporal sites (T7/T8), the Chinese group had larger amplitude, as compared to English, across stimuli, but also limited to the Na-Pb component and right temporal site. In the brainstem, F0 magnitude decreased with increasing pitch height; Chinese had larger magnitude across stimuli. A comparison of CPR and FFR responses revealed distinct patterns of relative changes in magnitude common to both groups. CPR amplitude increased and FFR amplitude decreased with increasing pitch height. Experience-dependent effects on CPR components vary as a function of neural sensitivity to pitch height within a particular temporal window (Na-Pb). Differences between the auditory brainstem and cortex imply distinct neural mechanisms for pitch extraction at both levels of brain structure.
Copyright © 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; cortical pitch response; fundamental frequency response; iterated rippled noise; pitch encoding; pitch height

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108254      PMCID: PMC5337167          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  51 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Roy D Patterson; Michael Scherg; Stefan Uppenkamp; André Rupp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

4.  Brain potentials as objective indexes of auditory pitch extraction from harmonics.

Authors:  R Ragot; R Lepaul-Ercole
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.

Authors:  Emily X Han; Joseph M Fernandez; Caitlin Swanberg; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Human Brainstem Exhibits higher Sensitivity and Specificity than Auditory-Related Cortex to Short-Term Phonetic Discrimination Learning.

Authors:  Stefan Elmer; Marcela Hausheer; Joëlle Albrecht; Jürg Kühnis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.