Literature DB >> 28237533

Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Chandan H Suresh2, Jackson T Gandour3.   

Abstract

The cortical pitch-specific response (CPR) is differentially sensitive to pitch contours varying in rate of acceleration-time-variant Mandarin Tone2 (T2) versus constant, linear rising ramp (Linear)-as a function of language experience (Krishnan, Gandour, & Suresh, 2014). CPR and brainstem frequency following response (FFR) data were recorded concurrently from native Mandarin listeners using the same stimuli. Results showed that T2 elicited larger responses than Linear at both cortical and brainstem levels (CPR: Na-Pb, Pb-Nb; FFR). However, Pb-Nb exhibited a larger difference in magnitude between T2 and Linear than either Na-Pb or FFR. This finding highlights differential weighting of brain responses elicited by a specific temporal attribute of pitch. Consistent with the notion of a distributed, integrated hierarchical pitch processing network, temporal attributes of pitch are differentially weighted by subcortical and cortical level processing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical pitch response; Experience-dependent plasticity; Functional asymmetry; Fundamental frequency response; Iterated rippled noise; Lexical tone; Mandarin Chinese; Pitch; Pitch acceleration; Pitch encoding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28237533      PMCID: PMC5425296          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  35 in total

1.  Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Roy D Patterson; André Rupp; Stefan Uppenkamp; Michael Scherg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 5.  An integrative model of subcortical auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Pitch processing of dynamic lexical tones in the auditory cortex is influenced by sensory and extrasensory processes.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Ratree Wayland; Mingzhen Bao; Christopher M Barkley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Language related differences of the sustained response evoked by natural speech sounds.

Authors:  Christina Siu-Dschu Fan; Xingyu Zhu; Hans Günter Dosch; Christiane von Stutterheim; André Rupp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.