Literature DB >> 19223793

Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour, Gavin M Bidelman, Jayaganesh Swaminathan.   

Abstract

Brainstem frequency-following responses were recorded from Chinese and English participants in response to an iterated rippled noise homologue of Mandarin Tone 2 (T2) and linear and inverted curvilinear variants. Pitch-tracking accuracy and pitch strength analyses showed advantages for the Chinese group over the English in response to T2 only. Pitch strength was larger for the Chinese group in rapidly changing sections of T2 compared with corresponding sections of a linear ramp. We conclude that experience-dependent neural plasticity at subcortical levels of representation is highly sensitive to specific features of pitch patterns in one's native language. Such experience-dependent effects suggest that subcortical sensory encoding interacts with cognitive processing in the cerebral cortex to shape the perceptual system's response to pitch patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19223793      PMCID: PMC2692950          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283263000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  18 in total

1.  Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Brainstem origins for cortical 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Trent Nicol
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Peter Cariani
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

5.  Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Erika Skoe; Nicole M Russo; Tasha Dees; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost; R Patterson; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Lan; K B Nie; S K Gao; F G Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  48 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

4.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.