Literature DB >> 17942999

Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.

Bharath Chandrasekaran1, Jackson T Gandour, Ananthanarayan Krishnan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An auditory electrophysiological study was conducted to explore the influence of language experience on the saliency of dimensions underlying cortical pitch processing.
METHODS: Mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to Mandarin tones were recorded in Chinese and English participants (n=10 per group) using a passive oddball paradigm. Stimuli consisted of three tones (T1: high level; T2: high rising; T3: low falling-rising). There were three oddball conditions (standard/deviant): T1/T2, T1/T3, T2/T3. In the T1/T2 and T1/T3 conditions, each tonal pair represented a contrast between a level and a contour tone; the T2/T3 condition, a contrast between two contour tones. Twenty dissimilarity matrices were created using the MMN mean amplitude measured from the Fz location for each condition per participant, and analyzed by an individual differences multidimensional scaling model.
RESULTS: Two pitch dimensions were revealed, interpretively labeled as 'height' and 'contour'. The latter was found to be more important for Chinese than English subjects. Using individual weights on the contour dimension, a discriminant function showed that 17 out of 20 participants were correctly classified into their respective language groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The MMN can serve as an index of pitch features that are differentially weighted depending on a listener's experience with lexical tones and their acoustic correlates within a particular tone space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942999      PMCID: PMC4380289     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  38 in total

1.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians.

Authors:  S Koelsch; E Schröger; M Tervaniemi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception.

Authors:  J Gandour; D Wong; L Hsieh; B Weinzapfel; D Van Lancker; G D Hutchins
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; M Rytkönen; E Schröger; R J Ilmoniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The fate of sounds in conductors' brains: an ERP study.

Authors:  Wido Nager; Christine Kohlmetz; Eckart Altenmüller; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

5.  Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure.

Authors:  Takako Fujioka; Laurel J Trainor; Bernhard Ross; Ryusuke Kakigi; Christo Pantev
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones.

Authors:  Anne Caclin; Stephen McAdams; Bennett K Smith; Suzanne Winsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Activation of the left planum temporale in pitch processing is shaped by language experience.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Thomas Talavage; Donald Wong; Mario Dzemidzic; Yunxia Tong; Xiaojian Li; Mark Lowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Selective tuning of cortical sound-feature processing by language experience.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; T Jacobsen; S Röttger; T Kujala; A Widmann; M Vainio; R Näätänen; E Schröger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training.

Authors:  N Kraus; T McGee; T D Carrell; C King; K Tremblay; T Nicol
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  35 in total

1.  Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Padma D Sampath; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Experience-dependent neural plasticity is sensitive to shape of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Role of Corticostriatal Systems in Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  Han-Gyol Yi; W Todd Maddox; Jeanette A Mumford; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.