Literature DB >> 26903418

Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jackson T Gandour2, Chandan H Suresh3.   

Abstract

Neural representation of pitch-relevant information at the brainstem and cortical levels of processing is influenced by language experience. A well-known attribute of pitch is its salience. Brainstem frequency following responses and cortical pitch specific responses, recorded concurrently, were elicited by a pitch salience continuum spanning weak to strong pitch of a dynamic, iterated rippled noise pitch contour-homolog of a Mandarin tone. Our aims were to assess how language experience (Chinese, English) affects i) enhancement of neural activity associated with pitch salience at brainstem and cortical levels, ii) the presence of asymmetry in cortical pitch representation, and iii) patterns of relative changes in magnitude along the pitch salience continuum. Peak latency (Fz: Na, Pb, and Nb) was shorter in the Chinese than the English group across the continuum. Peak-to-peak amplitude (Fz: Na-Pb, Pb-Nb) of the Chinese group grew larger with increasing pitch salience, but an experience-dependent advantage was limited to the Na-Pb component. At temporal sites (T7/T8), the larger amplitude of the Chinese group across the continuum was both limited to the Na-Pb component and the right temporal site. At the brainstem level, F0 magnitude gets larger as you increase pitch salience, and it too reveals Chinese superiority. A direct comparison of cortical and brainstem responses for the Chinese group reveals different patterns of relative changes in magnitude along the pitch salience continuum. Such differences may point to a transformation in pitch processing at the cortical level presumably mediated by local sensory and/or extrasensory influence overlaid on the brainstem output.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Cortical pitch response; Fundamental frequency response; Iterated rippled noise; Pitch encoding; Pitch strength

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26903418      PMCID: PMC4821701          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  82 in total

1.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  An integrative model of subcortical auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Distribution of descending projections from primary auditory neocortex to inferior colliculus mimics the topography of intracollicular projections.

Authors:  E Saldaña; M Feliciano; E Mugnaini
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  A coding transformation for temporally structured sounds within auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Roy Patterson; Katrin Krumbholz; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  10 in total

1.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Context-dependent plasticity in the subcortical encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.

Authors:  Joseph C Y Lau; Patrick C M Wong; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Complementary metrics of human auditory nerve function derived from compound action potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Kenneth I Vaden; Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Neural Correlates of Indicators of Sound Change in Cantonese: Evidence from Cortical and Subcortical Processes.

Authors:  Akshay R Maggu; Fang Liu; Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Human Brainstem Exhibits higher Sensitivity and Specificity than Auditory-Related Cortex to Short-Term Phonetic Discrimination Learning.

Authors:  Stefan Elmer; Marcela Hausheer; Joëlle Albrecht; Jürg Kühnis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.