Literature DB >> 28927640

Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Chandan H Suresh1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan2, Jackson T Gandour3.   

Abstract

Long-term experience enhances neural representation of temporal attributes of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex in favorable listening conditions. Herein we examine whether cortical pitch mechanisms shaped by language experience are more resilient to degradation in background noise, and exhibit greater binaural release from masking (BRM). Cortical pitch responses (CPR) were recorded from Mandarin- and English-speaking natives using a Mandarin word exhibiting a high rising pitch (/yi2/). Stimuli were presented diotically in Quiet, and in noise at +5, and 0 dB SNR. CPRs were also recorded in binaural conditions, SONO (where signal and noise were in phase at both ears); or S0Nπ (where signal was in phase and noise 180° out of phase at each ear), using 0 dB SNR. At Fz, both groups showed increase in CPR peak latency and decrease in amplitude with increasing noise level. A language-dependent enhancement of Na-Pb amplitude (Chinese > English) was restricted to Quiet and +5 dB SNR conditions. At T7/T8 electrode sites, Chinese natives exhibited a rightward asymmetry for both CPR components. A language-dependent effect (Chinese > English) was restricted to T8. Regarding BRM, both CPR components showed greater response amplitude for the S0Nπ condition compared to S0N0 across groups. Rightward asymmetry for BRM in the Chinese group indicates experience-dependent recruitment of right auditory cortex. Restriction of the advantage in pitch representation to the quiet and +5 SNR conditions, and the absence of group differences in the binaural release from masking, suggest that language experience affords limited advantage in the neural representation of pitch-relevant information in the auditory cortex under adverse listening conditions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory cortex; Background noise; Binaural release from masking; Experience-dependent plasticity; Pitch; Signal-to-noise ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28927640      PMCID: PMC5675814          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  68 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  TIME-INTENSITY RELATIONS IN BINAURAL UNMASKING.

Authors:  H S COLBURN; N I DURLACH
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Superior voice timbre processing in musicians.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Chartrand; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Effect of musical experience on learning lexical tone categories.

Authors:  T Christina Zhao; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural phase effects in the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  C G Fowler; C M Mikami
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Hemispheric asymmetry for spectral and temporal processing in the human antero-lateral auditory belt cortex.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Rudolf Rübsamen; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Kelly L Tremblay; G Christopher Stecker; Wendy M Tolin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Cortical dynamics of acoustic and phonological processing in speech perception.

Authors:  Linjun Zhang; Jie Xi; Guoqing Xu; Hua Shu; Xiaoyi Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.