Literature DB >> 18596621

Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Jackson T Gandour.   

Abstract

Frequency-following responses were recorded from Chinese and English participants at the level of the brainstem in response to four Mandarin tonal contours presented in a speech and nonspeech context. Pitch strength analysis of these preattentive brainstem responses showed that the Chinese group exhibited stronger pitch representation than the English group regardless of context. Moreover, the Chinese group exhibited relatively more robust pitch representation of rapidly changing pitch segments. These findings support the view that at early preattentive stages of subcortical processing, neural mechanisms underlying pitch representation are shaped by particular features of the auditory stream rather than speech per se. These findings have implications for optimizing signal-processing strategies for cochlear implant design for speakers of tonal languages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596621      PMCID: PMC4373527          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283088d31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  13 in total

1.  Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.

Authors:  C J Hsu; M J Horng; Q J Fu
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

2.  Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by nucleus-24 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Mei-Ji Horng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Peter Cariani
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

5.  Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model.

Authors:  Susan Denham
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The field trial of the SPEAK versus MPEAK speech coding strategies in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  S Y Liu; T S Huang; M Follent
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997

9.  Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones.

Authors:  S Greenberg; J T Marsh; W S Brown; J C Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Lan; K B Nie; S K Gao; F G Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  39 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

3.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems.

Authors:  Christine Brennan; Fan Cao; Nicole Pedroarena-Leal; Chris McNorgan; James R Booth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A neurophysiological study into the foundations of tonal harmony.

Authors:  Elika Bergelson; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.