Literature DB >> 24687519

[Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

K-P Günther1, T Wegner, S Kirschner, A Hartmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restore primary center of rotation and reconstruct extensive bone defects in hip revision surgery with a modular off-label implant combined with antiprotrusion cage and metal augment, thus, achieving improved hip function. INDICATIONS: Large segmental acetabular defects with nonsupportive columns (Paprosky type 3a and 3b) in cup loosening or Girdlestone situation. In case of pelvic discontinuity posterior column-plating is possible. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persisting hip infection and severe systemic disorders impairing achievement of secondary stability through bony integration of metal augment. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Posterolateral (if dorsal column plating) or other approach. Remove loose implant and granulation tissue with sufficient exposure of bleeding bone. Size acetabular defect with trial components of augment and appropriate antiprotrusio cage. Fixation of selected metal augment with screws. Fill additional acetabular defects with morsellized bone graft. Open a slot into the ischium to fix the distal flange of the cage. If necessary, bend both flanges according to patient's anatomy. Enter the ischium with distal flange and gradual impaction of the antiprotrusio ring. Final stabilization of the ring with several screws aiming at the posterior column or the acetabular dome. Inject cement between ring and augment to stabilize the construction and avoid metal wear. Final cement fixation of a polyethylene liner or a dual-mobility cup into the antiprotrusio ring. In pelvic discontinuity with major instability osteosynthesis of the dorsal column can be performed prior to cementation. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Prophylaxis of periprosthetic infection, DVT and heterotopic ossification. Physical therapy with partial weight bearing (20 kp) for 6 weeks; in discontinuity initial wheel chair mobilization.
RESULTS: Since 2008, 72 off-label implantations of a combined antiprotrusio cage and a Trabecular Metal™ Augment were performed. A total of 44 patients (46 operations) were investigated at 38.8 (36-51) months postoperatively. In all, 36 patients had a bone defect according to Paprosky type 3a/b and in 3/4 patients with pelvic discontinuity additional osteosynthesis was performed. The WOMAC score increased from 39.8 (8.7-75) points preoperatively to 57.9 (16.7-97.9) points at follow-up. Migration or failure of implant components was not observed. In 11 % of dislocations and 11 % periprosthetic infections surgical revision was necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687519     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-013-0271-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  15 in total

1.  Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.

Authors:  Eerik T Skyttä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka O Paavolainen; Ville M Remes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.

Authors:  Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer; Michael R O'Rourke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.

Authors:  Jonah Hebert Davies; G Yves Laflamme; Josee Delisle; Julio Fernandes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  [Reconstruction of large acetabular defects using trabecular metal augments].

Authors:  Olaf Hasart; Carsten Perka; Rex Lehnigk; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  [Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Pavel Sebena
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years.

Authors:  L M Kwong; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Cementless sockets: optimums and outcomes.

Authors:  W G Paprosky
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 8.  Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Stefan Weiss; Matthias C M Klotz; Matthias Gondan; Sebastian Jaeger; Rudi G Bitsch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts.

Authors:  M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

10.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  11 in total

1.  The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Max Jaenisch; Manuel Kuhlmann; Miriam Wacker; P Johannes Wagenhäuser; Sascha Gravius; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max J Friedrich; Jan Schmolders; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: Problem-oriented treatment strategies].

Authors:  K P Günther; M Stiehler; J Goronzy; W Schneiders; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Hip endoprosthetics in osteoarthritis after acetabular fractures].

Authors:  W Schneiders; A Hartmann; T Meyner; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients].

Authors:  S C Herath; M F R Rollmann; T Histing; J H Holstein; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Strategies for cup revision].

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 7.  [Partial or full component exchange in hip revision? : The relevance of off-label use and mix & match].

Authors:  K P Günther; K Tucker; P Kjaersgaard-Andersen; J Lützner; J P Kretzer; R Nelissen; T Lange; L Zagra
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto; Marcos Murilo Santana Lima; Bruno Tavares Rabello; Leonardo da Silva Sena; Luiz Carlos Zacaron Júnior; Maurício Tarrago Viana
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-12-06

9.  Customised three-dimensional printed revision acetabular implant for large defect after failed triflange revision cup.

Authors:  Stefano Zanasi; Hassan Zmerly
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-25

10.  Tantalum Augments Combined with Antiprotrusio Cages for Massive Acetabular Defects in Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hinnerk Baecker; Sebastian Hardt; Matthew P Abdel; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.