Literature DB >> 20676820

[Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Bernd Fink1, Alexandra Grossmann, Pavel Sebena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Replacement of a loosened acetabular cup attended by massive bone defects involving both columns. Acetabular restoration and proof fixation of a new acetabular cup to restore a pain-free joint function. INDICATIONS: Segmental acetabular bone defects involving both columns (Paprosky type 3A, 3B) with loosened acetabular cup or a Girdlestone situation. In case of pelvic discontinuity (Paprosky type 4) combination with reconstructive osteosynthesis plates (for example, Synthes company, Bochum, Germany). CONTRAINDICATIONS: In cases of complete absence of the posterior and especially cranioposterior column combination with structural allograft reconstruction necessary. Relative: acetabular defects, that can be reconstructed by other, smaller implants, for example, press-fit acetabular cups. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the acetabulum by a conventional approach. Removal of the loosened acetabular cup. Cleaning of the acetabulum with a sharp spoon. Rebuilding of the hip center with a reamer. Choice of the size of the antiprotrusion ring using trial implants. Access chiseling for the inferior implant flange into the ischium. If necessary, adaptation of the superior and inferior flange alignment to the individual anatomy by bending. Filling of bone defects with allogenic bone chips. Knocking in of the inferior flange into the ischium. Simultaneous knocking in of both the ring in the acetabulum and the superior flange at the ischium. Screwing in of bolts from the interior of the ring into the iliac bone in the direction of hip forces. Additional positioning of screws due to the superior flange into the iliac bone. Cementing in of a polyethylene cup in the antiprotrusion ring. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Antithrombotic prophylaxis, physical therapy, gait training under full weight bearing of the limb.
RESULTS: 30 acetabular cup revisions with a new Burch-Schneider ring underwent prospective clinical and radiologic examination and were analyzed for an average follow-up of 20.6+/-7.8 months (3-36 months). The Harris Hip Score increased from preoperative 46.6 to postoperative 75.9 points. A loosening of the cage was not recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676820     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-8025-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  19 in total

1.  Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; L D Dorr; Y Y Won; D Longjohn; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.

Authors:  J Rosson; J Schatzker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

3.  Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Acetabular reinforcement in total hip replacement.

Authors:  G Mayer; K Hartseil
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

5.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A preliminary review of the Müller acetabular and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio support rings.

Authors:  J Schatzker; M K Glynn; D Ritter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

7.  Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  A J van Koeveringe; P E Ochsner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; C J Sutherland; R T Trousdale; C W Colwell; H P Chandler; D Ayres; A A Yashar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

10.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect.

Authors:  Jan Blacha; Jacek Gagała
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2004-10-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Max Jaenisch; Manuel Kuhlmann; Miriam Wacker; P Johannes Wagenhäuser; Sascha Gravius; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Periprosthetic bone defects of the hip joint].

Authors:  D C Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.