Literature DB >> 20932708

Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.

Eerik T Skyttä1, Antti Eskelinen, Pekka O Paavolainen, Ville M Remes.   

Abstract

We evaluated the survival of 827 acetabular revisions with Trabecular Metal Revision Shell using data from a nationwide arthroplasty register. The mean age of the patients was 69.1 years. The 3-year overall survivorship was 92% (95% confidence interval, 88-95), which coincides with earlier reports. Revision rate for aseptic loosening was only 2%. The most common reason for revision was dislocation of the prosthesis with or without malposition of the socket (60%). Age was found to have significant effect on cup survivorship: each additional year in age decreased the risk of revision by 2.4% (95 % confidence interval, 0.1-4.7; P = .044). We found no differences in survival rates between aseptic and septic revisions. Furthermore, sex, diagnosis, and hospital volume did not affect the survival.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932708     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  20 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

3.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Hip replacement in the athlete: is there a role?

Authors:  M J Wilson; R N Villar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Evaluation of the effect of custom burr holes on a surgeon's sense of screw fixation in revision porous metal cups.

Authors:  Mark A Nyland; Brent A Lanting; Hristo N Nikolov; Lyndsay E Somerville; Matthew G Teeter; James L Howard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-19

8.  Reconstruction options for acetabular revision.

Authors:  Erica D Taylor; James A Browne
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-07-18

9.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.