Literature DB >> 17016219

The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.

Wayne Paprosky1, Scott Sporer, Michael R O'Rourke.   

Abstract

We sought to determine if acetabular cages prevented rerevision and loosening in acetabular reconstructions in the setting of pelvic discontinuity. We followed 15 patients with 16 acetabular cage reconstructions for an average 5 years (range, 2-8 years). Acetabular classifications included two Type 2C, six Type IIIA, and eight Type IIIB. We assessed Merle d'Aubigné scores, rerevisions, radiographic loosening, and complications. We treated seven patients with structural allograft and six patients with cancellous allograft. Five hips (31%) were revised or resected because of aseptic loosening (4 hips) and sepsis (1 hip) at an average 46 months. Three additional hips were loose. Merle d'Aubigné scores for pain and walking increased from 3.7 points preoperatively to 6.8 points at the final followup. Complications included one infection, four nerve palsies, and one dislocation. Acetabular cages in the setting of pelvic discontinuity were associated with a high failure rate at intermediate-term followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016219     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246530.52253.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Mario Formagnana; Marco Bargagliotti; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 7.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

Review 9.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18

10.  Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; John J Bottros; Jonah B Hulst; Vamsi K Kancherla; Mario Moric; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.