Literature DB >> 25027976

Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.

Max J Friedrich1, Jan Schmolders, Robert D Michel, Thomas M Randau, Matthias D Wimmer, Hendrik Kohlhof, Dieter C Wirtz, Sascha Gravius.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with massive acetabular bone loss resulting in pelvic discontinuity represents a rare but challenging problem. The objective of this study was to present short to mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom-made acetabular implant in a consecutive series of patients with pelvic discontinuity.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 18 consecutive patients with massive acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type 3B) resulting in pelvic discontinuity reconstructed with revision total hip arthroplasty using a custom-made acetabular component. The prosthesis was created on the basis of a thin-cut 1-mm computed tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis. Initial stability of the implant was obtained by screw fixation. Harris hip score and sequential radiographs were used to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results.
RESULTS: At an average follow up of 30 months (range 17-62 months) 16 of 18 (88.9%) custom-made implants were considered radiographically stable without signs of acetabular migration of more than 2 mm in the horizontal or vertical direction, implant rotation or screw breakage. Complications included two periprosthetic joint infections treated with explantation of the implant. Three patients had recurrent dislocations postoperatively. The mean Harris hip score improved from 28 ± 12 points preoperatively to 69 ± 13 points at the time of last follow up.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity with a custom-made acetabular component can provide a durable solution with good clinical and radiographic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027976     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2443-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; S A Barrington; M F Brinson; M E Ruhling; D K DeBoer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Incidence and outcome after infection of megaprostheses.

Authors:  Hakan Pilge; Guntmar Gradl; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Hans Gollwitzer
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Management of acetabular bone stock deficiency.

Authors:  Stephen B Murphy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A L Whaley; D J Berry; W S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Evaluation of an interdisciplinary therapy algorithm in patients with prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Matthias D Wimmer; Thomas M Randau; Sabine Petersdorf; Geert I Pagenstert; Markus Weißkopf; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ginger E Holt; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Stefan Weiss; Matthias C M Klotz; Matthias Gondan; Sebastian Jaeger; Rudi G Bitsch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  14 in total

1.  The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Max Jaenisch; Manuel Kuhlmann; Miriam Wacker; P Johannes Wagenhäuser; Sascha Gravius; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert Michel; Andreas C Strauss; Matthias D Wimmer; Thomas M Randau; Peter H Pennekamp; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Chiarlone; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Mattia Alessio-Mazzola; Lamberto Felli; Giorgio Burastero
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Giulia Trovarelli; Antonio Berizzi; Elisa Pala; Anna Breda; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Acetabular reconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting in revision arthroplasty-a mean five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Ancuța Zazgyva; Sándor-György Zuh; Ciprian Oliviu Roman; István Gergely; Tudor Sorin Pop
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Biological downsizing : Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Koob; S Scheidt; T M Randau; M Gathen; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz; S Gravius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

10.  Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.