Literature DB >> 35759041

[Strategies for cup revision].

Maik Stiehler1, Klaus-Peter Günther2, Jens Goronzy2.   

Abstract

Hip arthroplasty revision management can range from simple procedures using standard implants to complex surgical interventions requiring the combined use of revision cups, metal augments, bone grafts, and antiprotrusio cages. The adequate restoration of biomechanics and function of the hip joint with reconstruction of the original center of rotation can be challenging. We present an overview of various available techniques with the associated implant and anchoring strategies and the respective clinical results depending on the acetabular defect situation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defect; Hip joint; Implant fixation; Revision surgery; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35759041     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04271-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)        ISSN: 2731-7145


  37 in total

1.  Trabecular Metal Augments for the Management of Paprosky Type III Defects Without Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Guido Grappiolo; Mattia Loppini; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Francesco Traverso; Giuseppe Mazziotta; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Treatment of High-Grade Acetabular Defects: Do Porous Titanium Cups Provide Better Stability Than Traditional Titanium Cups When Combined With an Augment?

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Maciej B Janoszka; Matthias C Klotz; Thomas Bruckner; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Volpin; S Konan; C Biz; R J Tansey; F S Haddad
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-04-13

4.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Reliability and Validity of Acetabular and Femoral Bone Loss Classification Systems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alex Gu; Marco Adriani; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Safa C Fassihi; Allina A Nocon; Mathias P Bostrom; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 6.  Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianyue Shen; Yanguo Qin; Yang Li; Xiongfeng Tang; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 13.400

7.  [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].

Authors:  S Fickert; S Pfeiffer; A Walter; K P Günther; W-C Witzleb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 9.  Comparison of Constrained Acetabular Components and Dual Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Eduard Van Eecke; Jens Vanbiervliet; Jan Dauwe; Michiel Mulier
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 10.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.